NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) — Net Asset Quality Index
NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 61.5% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $1.35 Billion minus total liabilities of $517.77 Million yields net assets of $828.76 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check asset resilience ratio of NeoGenomics Inc to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
NeoGenomics Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how NeoGenomics Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 61.5%, representing net assets of $828.76 Million against total assets of $1.35 Billion USD. See NEO net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for NeoGenomics Inc (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for NeoGenomics Inc from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see NeoGenomics Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 61.5% | $836.56 Million | $1.36 Billion | $523.27 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2024 | 55.1% | $902.34 Million | $1.64 Billion | $735.70 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 56.0% | $941.54 Million | $1.68 Billion | $739.69 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2022 | 57.4% | $998.02 Million | $1.74 Billion | $742.01 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2021 | 59.3% | $1.11 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $761.50 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2020 | 70.2% | $694.29 Million | $988.33 Million | $294.04 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2019 | 71.5% | $507.41 Million | $709.51 Million | $202.10 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.5% | $320.44 Million | $505.01 Million | $184.57 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2017 | 59.9% | $205.53 Million | $343.34 Million | $137.81 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2016 | 55.4% | $186.60 Million | $337.12 Million | $150.52 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2015 | 64.7% | $238.11 Million | $367.95 Million | $129.84 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2014 | 74.5% | $60.41 Million | $81.11 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +20.1 pp |
| 2013 | 54.4% | $21.71 Million | $39.92 Million | $18.20 Million | ▲ +23.7 pp |
| 2012 | 30.6% | $9.22 Million | $30.07 Million | $20.86 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2011 | 29.6% | $5.90 Million | $19.95 Million | $14.05 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2010 | 23.0% | $3.13 Million | $13.65 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2009 | 43.6% | $5.64 Million | $12.95 Million | $7.30 Million | ▲ +23.0 pp |
| 2008 | 20.6% | $1.50 Million | $7.30 Million | $5.79 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2007 | 35.6% | $2.32 Million | $6.52 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +33.9 pp |
| 2006 | 1.7% | $54.51K | $3.13 Million | $3.08 Million | ▲ +93.9 pp |
| 2005 | -92.1% | $-994.94K | $1.08 Million | $2.08 Million | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2004 | -72.1% | $-426.65K | $592.00K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2003 | -72.5% | $-367.80K | $507.04K | $874.84K | ▼ -77.8 pp |
| 2002 | 5.2% | $23.34K | $447.84K | $424.49K | ▲ +134.1 pp |
| 2001 | -128.9% | $-104.87K | $81.34K | $186.22K | ▲ +66991.0 pp |
| 2000 | -67119.9% | $-124.84K | $186.00 | $125.03K | — |