NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) — Net Asset Quality Index
NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 58.2% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $1.35 Billion minus total liabilities of $565.65 Million yields net assets of $786.59 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read total liabilities of NeoGenomics Inc for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
NeoGenomics Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how NeoGenomics Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 58.2%, representing net assets of $786.59 Million against total assets of $1.35 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see NEO company net worth.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for NeoGenomics Inc (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for NeoGenomics Inc from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check NeoGenomics Inc strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 61.5% | $836.56 Million | $1.36 Billion | $523.27 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2024 | 55.1% | $902.34 Million | $1.64 Billion | $735.70 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 56.0% | $941.54 Million | $1.68 Billion | $739.69 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2022 | 57.4% | $998.02 Million | $1.74 Billion | $742.01 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2021 | 59.3% | $1.11 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $761.50 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2020 | 70.2% | $694.29 Million | $988.33 Million | $294.04 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2019 | 71.5% | $507.41 Million | $709.51 Million | $202.10 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.5% | $320.44 Million | $505.01 Million | $184.57 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2017 | 59.9% | $205.53 Million | $343.34 Million | $137.81 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2016 | 55.4% | $186.60 Million | $337.12 Million | $150.52 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2015 | 64.7% | $238.11 Million | $367.95 Million | $129.84 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2014 | 74.5% | $60.41 Million | $81.11 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +20.1 pp |
| 2013 | 54.4% | $21.71 Million | $39.92 Million | $18.20 Million | ▲ +23.7 pp |
| 2012 | 30.6% | $9.22 Million | $30.07 Million | $20.86 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2011 | 29.6% | $5.90 Million | $19.95 Million | $14.05 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2010 | 23.0% | $3.13 Million | $13.65 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2009 | 43.6% | $5.64 Million | $12.95 Million | $7.30 Million | ▲ +23.0 pp |
| 2008 | 20.6% | $1.50 Million | $7.30 Million | $5.79 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2007 | 35.6% | $2.32 Million | $6.52 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +33.9 pp |
| 2006 | 1.7% | $54.51K | $3.13 Million | $3.08 Million | ▲ +93.9 pp |
| 2005 | -92.1% | $-994.94K | $1.08 Million | $2.08 Million | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2004 | -72.1% | $-426.65K | $592.00K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2003 | -72.5% | $-367.80K | $507.04K | $874.84K | ▼ -77.8 pp |
| 2002 | 5.2% | $23.34K | $447.84K | $424.49K | ▲ +134.1 pp |
| 2001 | -128.9% | $-104.87K | $81.34K | $186.22K | ▲ +66991.0 pp |
| 2000 | -67119.9% | $-124.84K | $186.00 | $125.03K | — |