Inotiv, Inc. (NOTVQ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Inotiv, Inc. (NOTVQ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($625.32 Million) in one year. Check NOTVQ cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Inotiv, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Inotiv, Inc. across 29 annual periods. See NOTVQ financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Inotiv, Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Inotiv, Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Inotiv, Inc. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-10.46 Million | $635.09 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-6.80 Million | $610.86 Million | ▼ -123.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $27.88 Million | $588.04 Million | ▲ +648.2% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-5.22 Million | $603.13 Million | ▼ -117.4% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $10.75 Million | $216.73 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $1.29 Million | $54.00 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $1.78 Million | $31.27 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $3.49 Million | $20.38 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $1.24 Million | $11.95 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $1.06 Million | $13.68 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $2.03 Million | $13.10 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $1.68 Million | $14.24 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $1.52 Million | $16.14 Million | ▲ +918.2% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-200.00K | $17.39 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $1.09 Million | $16.76 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $2.44 Million | $19.08 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $2.59 Million | $19.46 Million | ▲ +401.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $598.00K | $22.55 Million | ▼ -78.7% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $2.93 Million | $23.48 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $3.84 Million | $24.96 Million | ▲ +903.5% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-541.25K | $28.24 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $2.83 Million | $27.38 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $2.95 Million | $25.26 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $2.03 Million | $14.56 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $4.03 Million | $10.15 Million | ▲ +880.5% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-539.16K | $10.60 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.60 Million | $8.90 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $2.40 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +390.9% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $800.00K | $9.00 Million | — |