Universal Display (OLED) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Display (OLED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.57x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $108.88 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($190.74 Million) in one year. Explore Universal Display (OLED) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Display Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Display across 31 annual periods. Also explore Universal Display assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Display (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Display. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Display market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.00x | $210.83 Million | $211.84 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2024 | 1.18x | $253.74 Million | $215.81 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2023 | 0.70x | $154.78 Million | $221.74 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $126.81 Million | $257.45 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $191.10 Million | $367.00 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | $148.79 Million | $356.51 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | $193.91 Million | $308.71 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | $121.80 Million | $242.92 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2017 | 1.10x | $133.37 Million | $120.90 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $80.34 Million | $99.09 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2015 | 1.23x | $113.61 Million | $92.65 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2014 | 1.15x | $47.27 Million | $41.10 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 1.28x | $44.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +155.0% |
| 2012 | 0.50x | $17.75 Million | $35.29 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $16.41 Million | $31.65 Million | ▲ +530.8% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-4.20 Million | $34.90 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2009 | -0.71x | $-14.61 Million | $20.51 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2008 | -0.40x | $-7.79 Million | $19.51 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2007 | -0.70x | $-11.10 Million | $15.78 Million | ▼ -168.3% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-4.70 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -1130.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-345.06K | $16.20 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2004 | -0.47x | $-6.97 Million | $14.70 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2003 | -0.79x | $-5.80 Million | $7.29 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2002 | -0.80x | $-4.76 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | $-7.70 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2000 | -2.88x | $-6.49 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1999 | -4.83x | $-4.30 Million | $890.38K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1998 | -4.40x | $-2.20 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +45.0% |
| 1997 | -8.00x | $-2.40 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1996 | -24.00x | $-2.40 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -657.9% |
| 1995 | -3.17x | $-1.90 Million | $600.00K | — |