Universal Display Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Display cash flow-to-debt ratio. Universal Display (OLED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $24.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($203.77 Million) in one year. Check Universal Display earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Universal Display (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Universal Display from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Display across 31 annual periods. Check Universal Display total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Universal Display Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Universal Display cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Display. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Universal Display.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.04x | $210.83 Million | $202.74 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2024 | 1.18x | $253.74 Million | $215.81 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2023 | 0.70x | $154.78 Million | $221.74 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $126.81 Million | $257.45 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $191.10 Million | $367.00 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | $148.79 Million | $356.51 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | $193.91 Million | $308.71 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | $121.80 Million | $242.92 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2017 | 1.10x | $133.37 Million | $120.90 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $80.34 Million | $99.09 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2015 | 1.23x | $113.61 Million | $92.65 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2014 | 1.15x | $47.27 Million | $41.10 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 1.28x | $44.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +155.0% |
| 2012 | 0.50x | $17.75 Million | $35.29 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $16.41 Million | $31.65 Million | ▲ +530.8% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-4.20 Million | $34.90 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2009 | -0.71x | $-14.61 Million | $20.51 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2008 | -0.40x | $-7.79 Million | $19.51 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2007 | -0.70x | $-11.10 Million | $15.78 Million | ▼ -168.3% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-4.70 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -1130.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-345.06K | $16.20 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2004 | -0.47x | $-6.97 Million | $14.70 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2003 | -0.79x | $-5.80 Million | $7.29 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2002 | -0.80x | $-4.76 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | $-7.70 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2000 | -2.88x | $-6.49 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1999 | -4.83x | $-4.30 Million | $890.38K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1998 | -4.40x | $-2.20 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +45.0% |
| 1997 | -8.00x | $-2.40 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1996 | -24.00x | $-2.40 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -657.9% |
| 1995 | -3.17x | $-1.90 Million | $600.00K | — |