Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-133.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.18 Million) in one year. See Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Old Market Capital Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Old Market Capital Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Old Market Capital Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Old Market Capital Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Old Market Capital Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | $-1.90 Million | $10.65 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2024 | 1.83x | $1.83 Million | $996.00K | ▲ +2667.3% |
| 2023 | -0.07x | $-2.18 Million | $30.54 Million | ▼ -237.7% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $3.49 Million | $67.18 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $14.40 Million | $97.22 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $10.48 Million | $131.24 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $14.04 Million | $147.53 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $25.15 Million | $172.40 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $27.32 Million | $224.75 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $22.41 Million | $222.46 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $24.49 Million | $212.64 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $21.37 Million | $141.49 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $25.65 Million | $136.87 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $21.87 Million | $121.30 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $21.36 Million | $128.43 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $21.33 Million | $116.70 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $21.67 Million | $112.76 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $16.86 Million | $111.26 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $16.10 Million | $103.21 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $15.48 Million | $91.25 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $11.17 Million | $74.06 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $7.07 Million | $75.78 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $5.64 Million | $67.95 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $7.29 Million | $59.51 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $5.78 Million | $52.90 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $4.95 Million | $43.01 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $2.22 Million | $33.72 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $2.06 Million | $27.20 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $1.67 Million | $20.99 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $1.23 Million | $16.55 Million | — |