Old Market Capital Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Old Market Capital Corporation working capital to net assets ratio. Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 20.7% as of December 2025. Working capital of $13.54 Million (current assets of $17.96 Million minus current liabilities of $4.42 Million) is measured against net assets of $65.41 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check OMCC tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Old Market Capital Corporation (1996–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Old Market Capital Corporation from 1996 to 2025. This chart shows how Old Market Capital Corporation's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 10 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 20.7%, reflecting working capital of $13.54 Million against net assets of $65.41 Million USD. See defensive interval ratio of Old Market Capital Corporation to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Old Market Capital Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Old Market Capital Corporation working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Old Market Capital Corporation from 1996 to 2025, covering 10 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see OMCC total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36.6% | $24.53 Million | $67.02 Million | $27.44 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2024 | 33.6% | $19.79 Million | $58.84 Million | $19.88 Million | $99.00K | ▲ +67.3 pp |
| 2023 | -33.7% | $-26.89 Million | $79.81 Million | $3.47 Million | $30.36 Million | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2022 | -43.3% | $-50.35 Million | $116.39 Million | $9.18 Million | $59.53 Million | ▲ +8.7 pp |
| 2021 | -52.0% | $-59.92 Million | $115.22 Million | $26.23 Million | $86.15 Million | ▲ +39.3 pp |
| 2020 | -91.3% | $-98.27 Million | $107.58 Million | $25.99 Million | $124.25 Million | ▼ -182.9 pp |
| 2011 | 91.6% | $105.54 Million | $115.21 Million | $232.86 Million | $127.32 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 93.4% | $91.05 Million | $97.44 Million | $205.83 Million | $114.78 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2009 | 95.8% | $81.44 Million | $85.02 Million | $190.20 Million | $108.77 Million | ▲ +166.2 pp |
| 1996 | -70.4% | $-2.29 Million | $3.25 Million | $786.64K | $3.08 Million | — |