Quantum Corporation (QMCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quantum Corporation (QMCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($333.50 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Quantum Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quantum Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quantum Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Quantum Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quantum Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quantum Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see QMCO stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.07x | $-23.61 Million | $319.77 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-10.16 Million | $309.11 Million | ▼ -100.1% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-4.89 Million | $298.03 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-33.73 Million | $345.37 Million | ▼ -3811.0% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-767.00K | $307.17 Million | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-1.18 Million | $364.52 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-16.86 Million | $372.65 Million | ▼ -238.1% |
| 2018 | -0.01x | $-5.03 Million | $376.11 Million | ▼ -153.3% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $8.56 Million | $341.03 Million | ▲ +176.3% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-11.72 Million | $356.49 Million | ▼ -327.5% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $6.03 Million | $417.60 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $35.47 Million | $449.20 Million | ▲ +360.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $7.74 Million | $451.25 Million | ▼ -83.4% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $45.66 Million | $442.03 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $52.33 Million | $492.08 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $100.16 Million | $595.40 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $89.10 Million | $669.33 Million | ▲ +333.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $25.74 Million | $837.72 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $63.81 Million | $871.39 Million | ▲ +718.7% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $3.42 Million | $382.27 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $26.26 Million | $413.93 Million | ▲ +1327.0% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-2.06 Million | $399.01 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $17.62 Million | $566.57 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $38.84 Million | $633.27 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $178.46 Million | $603.36 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2000 | 0.88x | $496.67 Million | $563.45 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1999 | 1.12x | $463.89 Million | $415.10 Million | ▲ +319.1% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $284.35 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $312.70 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +315.0% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-164.10 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -169.2% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $161.10 Million | $971.50 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $71.30 Million | $586.10 Million | ▲ +313.6% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-30.10 Million | $528.40 Million | ▼ -126.9% |
| 1992 | 0.21x | $50.40 Million | $238.40 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 1991 | 0.32x | $79.50 Million | $251.10 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1990 | 0.45x | $40.70 Million | $89.60 Million | — |