Quantum Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Quantum Corporation tangible net worth ratio. Quantum Corporation (QMCO) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 41.3% as of September 2008. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($127.74 Million) from net assets ($217.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore QMCO net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Quantum Corporation (1986–2008)
Tangible net worth ratio of Quantum Corporation from 1986 to 2008. This chart shows how Quantum Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 1986 to 2008. As of September 2008, the ratio stands at 41.3%, reflecting net assets of $217.58 Million with intangible assets of $127.74 Million USD.
Quantum Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1986–2008)
Quantum Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 1986 to 2008. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Quantum Corporation from 1986 to 2008, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Quantum Corporation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 34.3% | $228.00 Million | $149.89 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2007 | 21.9% | $254.44 Million | $198.60 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -39.9 pp |
| 2006 | 61.9% | $281.07 Million | $107.12 Million | $663.34 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 62.9% | $310.68 Million | $115.20 Million | $724.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 65.2% | $306.55 Million | $106.56 Million | $705.56 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2003 | 66.1% | $355.16 Million | $120.36 Million | $921.73 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2002 | 64.3% | $560.50 Million | $200.12 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -18.2 pp |
| 2001 | 82.5% | $1.30 Billion | $227.50 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2000 | 80.9% | $1.30 Billion | $248.29 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +17.7 pp |
| 1999 | 63.2% | $598.54 Million | $220.37 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 1998 | 46.2% | $1.37 Billion | $737.93 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -49.1 pp |
| 1997 | 95.3% | $890.10 Million | $42.10 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 1996 | 87.8% | $544.80 Million | $66.30 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 1995 | 81.2% | $509.50 Million | $95.80 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $411.30 Million | $0.00 | $997.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $398.20 Million | $0.00 | $926.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $308.40 Million | $0.00 | $546.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $238.30 Million | $0.00 | $489.40 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 1990 | 94.3% | $153.60 Million | $8.70 Million | $243.20 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 1989 | 90.6% | $100.20 Million | $9.40 Million | $157.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1988 | 91.1% | $114.10 Million | $10.10 Million | $141.70 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $108.10 Million | $0.00 | $137.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $105.80 Million | $0.00 | $126.20 Million | — |