Quantum Corporation (QMCO) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Quantum Corporation (QMCO) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 41.3% as of September 2008. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($127.74 Million) from net assets ($217.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Quantum Corporation short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Quantum Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1986–2008)
This chart shows how Quantum Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 1986 to 2008. As of September 2008, the ratio stands at 41.3%, reflecting net assets of $217.58 Million with intangible assets of $127.74 Million USD. See QMCO days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Quantum Corporation (1986–2008)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Quantum Corporation from 1986 to 2008, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see QMCO stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 34.3% | $228.00 Million | $149.89 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2007 | 21.9% | $254.44 Million | $198.60 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -39.9 pp |
| 2006 | 61.9% | $281.07 Million | $107.12 Million | $663.34 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 62.9% | $310.68 Million | $115.20 Million | $724.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 65.2% | $306.55 Million | $106.56 Million | $705.56 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2003 | 66.1% | $355.16 Million | $120.36 Million | $921.73 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2002 | 64.3% | $560.50 Million | $200.12 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -18.2 pp |
| 2001 | 82.5% | $1.30 Billion | $227.50 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2000 | 80.9% | $1.30 Billion | $248.29 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +17.7 pp |
| 1999 | 63.2% | $598.54 Million | $220.37 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 1998 | 46.2% | $1.37 Billion | $737.93 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -49.1 pp |
| 1997 | 95.3% | $890.10 Million | $42.10 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 1996 | 87.8% | $544.80 Million | $66.30 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 1995 | 81.2% | $509.50 Million | $95.80 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $411.30 Million | $0.00 | $997.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $398.20 Million | $0.00 | $926.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $308.40 Million | $0.00 | $546.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $238.30 Million | $0.00 | $489.40 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 1990 | 94.3% | $153.60 Million | $8.70 Million | $243.20 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 1989 | 90.6% | $100.20 Million | $9.40 Million | $157.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1988 | 91.1% | $114.10 Million | $10.10 Million | $141.70 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $108.10 Million | $0.00 | $137.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $105.80 Million | $0.00 | $126.20 Million | — |