Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.74 Million) in one year. Check RIME capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-8.56 Million | $28.82 Million | ▼ -1190.8% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $548.00K | $20.14 Million | ▲ +152.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-330.00K | $6.32 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.01 Million | $22.26 Million | ▼ -797.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $171.02K | $13.20 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $444.76K | $10.91 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $187.45K | $3.69 Million | ▲ +138.2% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-710.00K | $5.34 Million | ▼ -154.8% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.02 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2016 | 0.53x | $2.55 Million | $4.81 Million | ▲ +497.8% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | $-1.11 Million | $8.29 Million | ▼ -1761.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $64.43K | $8.02 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $1.68 Million | $7.03 Million | ▲ +734.1% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-237.48K | $6.29 Million | ▼ -126.7% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $930.96K | $6.58 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-754.72K | $6.14 Million | ▼ -168.8% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.03 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +141.9% |
| 2008 | -0.43x | $-1.35 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2007 | -0.77x | $-2.12 Million | $2.76 Million | ▼ -1353.1% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-432.26K | $8.19 Million | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $1.12 Million | $9.65 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $3.22 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-11.52 Million | $21.25 Million | ▼ -215.0% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $2.44 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2001 | 0.78x | $1.24 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +516.3% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-82.28K | $440.62K | ▼ -7103.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-3.67K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-191.31K | $5.09 Million | — |