Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.74 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RIME company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-8.56 Million | $28.82 Million | ▼ -1190.8% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $548.00K | $20.14 Million | ▲ +152.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-330.00K | $6.32 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.01 Million | $22.26 Million | ▼ -797.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $171.02K | $13.20 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $444.76K | $10.91 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $187.45K | $3.69 Million | ▲ +138.2% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-710.00K | $5.34 Million | ▼ -154.8% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.02 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2016 | 0.53x | $2.55 Million | $4.81 Million | ▲ +497.8% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | $-1.11 Million | $8.29 Million | ▼ -1761.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $64.43K | $8.02 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $1.68 Million | $7.03 Million | ▲ +734.1% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-237.48K | $6.29 Million | ▼ -126.7% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $930.96K | $6.58 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-754.72K | $6.14 Million | ▼ -168.8% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.03 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +141.9% |
| 2008 | -0.43x | $-1.35 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2007 | -0.77x | $-2.12 Million | $2.76 Million | ▼ -1353.1% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-432.26K | $8.19 Million | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $1.12 Million | $9.65 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $3.22 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-11.52 Million | $21.25 Million | ▼ -215.0% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $2.44 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2001 | 0.78x | $1.24 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +516.3% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-82.28K | $440.62K | ▼ -7103.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-3.67K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-191.31K | $5.09 Million | — |