Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.74 Million) in one year. Check Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. across 30 annual periods. Check Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RIME cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-8.56 Million | $28.82 Million | ▼ -1190.8% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $548.00K | $20.14 Million | ▲ +152.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-330.00K | $6.32 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.01 Million | $22.26 Million | ▼ -797.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $171.02K | $13.20 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $444.76K | $10.91 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $187.45K | $3.69 Million | ▲ +138.2% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-710.00K | $5.34 Million | ▼ -154.8% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.02 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2016 | 0.53x | $2.55 Million | $4.81 Million | ▲ +497.8% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | $-1.11 Million | $8.29 Million | ▼ -1761.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $64.43K | $8.02 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $1.68 Million | $7.03 Million | ▲ +734.1% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-237.48K | $6.29 Million | ▼ -126.7% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $930.96K | $6.58 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-754.72K | $6.14 Million | ▼ -168.8% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.03 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +141.9% |
| 2008 | -0.43x | $-1.35 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2007 | -0.77x | $-2.12 Million | $2.76 Million | ▼ -1353.1% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-432.26K | $8.19 Million | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $1.12 Million | $9.65 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $3.22 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-11.52 Million | $21.25 Million | ▼ -215.0% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $2.44 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2001 | 0.78x | $1.24 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +516.3% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-82.28K | $440.62K | ▼ -7103.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-3.67K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $127.87K | $5.52 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-191.31K | $5.09 Million | — |