Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) — Net Asset Quality Index
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 0.9% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $10.85 Million minus total liabilities of $10.74 Million yields net assets of $100.00K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check RIME asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1996–2025)
This chart shows how Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 30 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at 0.9%, representing net assets of $100.00K against total assets of $10.85 Million USD. See RIME working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (1996–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. from 1996 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of Algorhythm Holdings, Inc..
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -57.5% | $-10.52 Million | $18.30 Million | $28.82 Million | ▼ -84.8 pp |
| 2024 | 27.3% | $7.58 Million | $27.71 Million | $20.14 Million | ▼ -34.7 pp |
| 2023 | 62.1% | $10.33 Million | $16.65 Million | $6.32 Million | ▲ +27.4 pp |
| 2022 | 34.6% | $11.80 Million | $34.06 Million | $22.26 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2021 | 40.8% | $9.10 Million | $22.30 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2020 | 34.3% | $5.69 Million | $16.60 Million | $10.91 Million | ▼ -35.4 pp |
| 2019 | 69.7% | $8.50 Million | $12.19 Million | $3.69 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2018 | 59.4% | $7.81 Million | $13.15 Million | $5.34 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 64.0% | $7.44 Million | $11.64 Million | $4.19 Million | ▲ +9.9 pp |
| 2016 | 54.0% | $5.65 Million | $10.46 Million | $4.81 Million | ▲ +21.9 pp |
| 2015 | 32.1% | $3.93 Million | $12.21 Million | $8.29 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2014 | 31.6% | $3.71 Million | $11.73 Million | $8.02 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2013 | 27.0% | $2.60 Million | $9.63 Million | $7.03 Million | ▲ +36.7 pp |
| 2012 | -9.7% | $-557.88K | $5.73 Million | $6.29 Million | ▲ +9.2 pp |
| 2011 | -18.9% | $-1.05 Million | $5.53 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2010 | -7.9% | $-447.57K | $5.69 Million | $6.14 Million | ▼ -38.8 pp |
| 2009 | 31.0% | $2.58 Million | $8.33 Million | $5.75 Million | ▼ -25.2 pp |
| 2008 | 56.2% | $4.07 Million | $7.24 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2007 | 51.2% | $2.90 Million | $5.66 Million | $2.76 Million | ▲ +132.1 pp |
| 2006 | -80.9% | $-3.66 Million | $4.52 Million | $8.19 Million | ▼ -55.1 pp |
| 2005 | -25.9% | $-1.99 Million | $7.67 Million | $9.65 Million | ▼ -27.3 pp |
| 2004 | 1.4% | $216.81K | $15.42 Million | $15.20 Million | ▼ -44.0 pp |
| 2003 | 45.4% | $17.69 Million | $38.94 Million | $21.25 Million | ▼ -30.4 pp |
| 2002 | 75.8% | $16.23 Million | $21.40 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -9.1 pp |
| 2001 | 84.9% | $8.92 Million | $10.51 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2000 | 89.9% | $3.91 Million | $4.35 Million | $440.62K | ▲ +49.3 pp |
| 1999 | 40.5% | $964.74K | $2.38 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +239.9 pp |
| 1998 | -199.3% | $-3.67 Million | $1.84 Million | $5.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | -199.3% | $-3.67 Million | $1.84 Million | $5.52 Million | ▼ -202.8 pp |
| 1996 | 3.5% | $183.74K | $5.27 Million | $5.09 Million | — |