Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($670.31 Million) in one year. Check Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $7.05 Million | $725.58 Million | ▲ +740.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-1.16 Million | $762.38 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $35.53 Million | $830.36 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $47.29 Million | $852.02 Million | ▲ +134.3% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $20.23 Million | $854.03 Million | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $57.91 Million | $877.06 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $126.30 Million | $461.14 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $156.61 Million | $523.18 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $98.96 Million | $570.49 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | $140.92 Million | $465.67 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $123.58 Million | $376.12 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $113.53 Million | $287.24 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2012 | 0.33x | $94.38 Million | $290.21 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $95.70 Million | $298.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $70.61 Million | $278.60 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $90.61 Million | $311.47 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $91.14 Million | $340.83 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $93.56 Million | $264.35 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | $78.53 Million | $207.06 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $65.43 Million | $129.56 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $55.52 Million | $102.77 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $39.94 Million | $76.57 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | $29.11 Million | $70.64 Million | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | $25.54 Million | $107.46 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $9.48 Million | $104.05 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $7.34 Million | $85.57 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $8.21 Million | $74.63 Million | — |