Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($670.31 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore RRGB net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $7.05 Million | $725.58 Million | ▲ +740.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-1.16 Million | $762.38 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $35.53 Million | $830.36 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $47.29 Million | $852.02 Million | ▲ +134.3% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $20.23 Million | $854.03 Million | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $57.91 Million | $877.06 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $126.30 Million | $461.14 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $156.61 Million | $523.18 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $98.96 Million | $570.49 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | $140.92 Million | $465.67 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $123.58 Million | $376.12 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $113.53 Million | $287.24 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2012 | 0.33x | $94.38 Million | $290.21 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $95.70 Million | $298.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $70.61 Million | $278.60 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $90.61 Million | $311.47 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $91.14 Million | $340.83 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $93.56 Million | $264.35 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | $78.53 Million | $207.06 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $65.43 Million | $129.56 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $55.52 Million | $102.77 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $39.94 Million | $76.57 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | $29.11 Million | $70.64 Million | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | $25.54 Million | $107.46 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $9.48 Million | $104.05 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $7.34 Million | $85.57 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $8.21 Million | $74.63 Million | — |