Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (RRGB) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -493.0% as of June 2023. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($17.94 Million) from net assets ($3.03 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See shareholders equity of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2022)
This chart shows how Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of June 2023, the ratio stands at -493.0%, reflecting net assets of $3.03 Million with intangible assets of $17.94 Million USD. Also explore RRGB net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see RRGB market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -890.9% | $1.79 Million | $17.73 Million | $832.14 Million | ▼ -963.2 pp |
| 2021 | 72.3% | $76.97 Million | $21.29 Million | $929.00 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2020 | 79.5% | $120.71 Million | $24.71 Million | $974.74 Million | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2019 | 91.7% | $360.52 Million | $29.98 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2018 | 91.0% | $382.81 Million | $34.61 Million | $843.94 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2017 | 90.1% | $387.44 Million | $38.27 Million | $910.62 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2016 | 87.9% | $348.05 Million | $42.27 Million | $918.54 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 89.4% | $374.31 Million | $39.57 Million | $839.98 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2014 | 88.2% | $359.77 Million | $42.48 Million | $735.89 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2013 | 89.4% | $347.40 Million | $36.80 Million | $634.64 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2012 | 87.9% | $306.92 Million | $37.20 Million | $597.13 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2011 | 86.8% | $294.70 Million | $38.97 Million | $592.98 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2010 | 85.7% | $300.66 Million | $43.06 Million | $579.26 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2009 | 83.6% | $288.62 Million | $47.43 Million | $600.10 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2008 | 80.7% | $268.91 Million | $51.99 Million | $609.74 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2007 | 85.6% | $284.44 Million | $41.06 Million | $548.79 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2006 | 90.6% | $243.53 Million | $22.77 Million | $450.60 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2005 | 96.4% | $204.86 Million | $7.37 Million | $334.42 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2004 | 95.3% | $161.73 Million | $7.58 Million | $264.50 Million | ▲ +20.6 pp |
| 2003 | 74.7% | $133.64 Million | $33.84 Million | $210.21 Million | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2002 | 65.6% | $98.99 Million | $34.08 Million | $169.63 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 2001 | 52.0% | $46.98 Million | $22.55 Million | $154.44 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2000 | 40.4% | $38.79 Million | $23.11 Million | $142.84 Million | — |