Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $364.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($39.02 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Starbucks Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Starbucks Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Starbucks Corporation across 35 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Starbucks Corporation growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Starbucks Corporation (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Starbucks Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Starbucks Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $4.75 Billion | $40.11 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $6.10 Billion | $38.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $6.01 Billion | $37.43 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $4.40 Billion | $36.68 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $5.99 Billion | $36.71 Billion | ▲ +279.6% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $1.60 Billion | $37.17 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $5.05 Billion | $25.45 Billion | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | $11.94 Billion | $22.98 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2017 | 0.47x | $4.17 Billion | $8.91 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.54x | $4.58 Billion | $8.44 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.57x | $3.75 Billion | $6.63 Billion | ▲ +410.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $607.80 Million | $5.48 Billion | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | $2.91 Billion | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $1.72 Billion | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $1.61 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | $1.70 Billion | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $1.39 Billion | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $1.26 Billion | $3.16 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $1.33 Billion | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | $1.13 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $923.61 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2004 | 0.94x | $793.85 Million | $841.41 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2003 | 0.88x | $566.45 Million | $647.32 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.84x | $477.69 Million | $566.10 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2001 | 0.98x | $460.83 Million | $470.18 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.93x | $318.57 Million | $341.14 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1999 | 0.72x | $210.60 Million | $291.50 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1998 | 0.72x | $142.90 Million | $198.50 Million | ▲ +127.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $101.00 Million | $318.90 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $136.70 Million | $274.90 Million | ▲ +580.5% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $11.40 Million | $156.00 Million | ▲ +691.9% |
| 1994 | -0.01x | $-1.50 Million | $121.50 Million | ▼ -114.4% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $9.00 Million | $104.90 Million | ▼ -87.9% |
| 1992 | 0.71x | $8.90 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +326.5% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $2.60 Million | $15.70 Million | — |