Starbucks Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Starbucks Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.64 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.96 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Starbucks Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Starbucks Corporation (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Starbucks Corporation from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Starbucks Corporation across 35 annual periods. Check SBUX capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Starbucks Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Starbucks Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Starbucks Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Starbucks Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $4.75 Billion | $40.11 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $6.10 Billion | $38.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $6.01 Billion | $37.43 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $4.40 Billion | $36.68 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $5.99 Billion | $36.71 Billion | ▲ +279.6% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $1.60 Billion | $37.17 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $5.05 Billion | $25.45 Billion | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | $11.94 Billion | $22.98 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2017 | 0.47x | $4.17 Billion | $8.91 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.54x | $4.58 Billion | $8.44 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.57x | $3.75 Billion | $6.63 Billion | ▲ +410.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $607.80 Million | $5.48 Billion | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | $2.91 Billion | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $1.72 Billion | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $1.61 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | $1.70 Billion | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $1.39 Billion | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $1.26 Billion | $3.16 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $1.33 Billion | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | $1.13 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $923.61 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2004 | 0.94x | $793.85 Million | $841.41 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2003 | 0.88x | $566.45 Million | $647.32 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.84x | $477.69 Million | $566.10 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2001 | 0.98x | $460.83 Million | $470.18 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.93x | $318.57 Million | $341.14 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1999 | 0.72x | $210.60 Million | $291.50 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1998 | 0.72x | $142.90 Million | $198.50 Million | ▲ +127.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $101.00 Million | $318.90 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $136.70 Million | $274.90 Million | ▲ +580.5% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $11.40 Million | $156.00 Million | ▲ +691.9% |
| 1994 | -0.01x | $-1.50 Million | $121.50 Million | ▼ -114.4% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $9.00 Million | $104.90 Million | ▼ -87.9% |
| 1992 | 0.71x | $8.90 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +326.5% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $2.60 Million | $15.70 Million | — |