Starbucks Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Starbucks Corporation tangible net worth ratio. Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 11.4% as of September 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.04 Billion) from net assets ($1.18 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check SBUX strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Starbucks Corporation (1991–2018)
Tangible net worth ratio of Starbucks Corporation from 1991 to 2018. This chart shows how Starbucks Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 28 annual periods from 1991 to 2018. As of September 2018, the ratio stands at 11.4%, reflecting net assets of $1.18 Billion with intangible assets of $1.04 Billion USD. See SBUX net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Starbucks Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1991–2018)
Starbucks Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 1991 to 2018. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Starbucks Corporation from 1991 to 2018, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see SBUX market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 11.4% | $1.18 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $24.16 Billion | ▼ -80.5 pp |
| 2017 | 91.9% | $5.46 Billion | $441.40 Million | $14.37 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 91.2% | $5.89 Billion | $516.30 Million | $14.33 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2015 | 91.1% | $5.82 Billion | $520.40 Million | $12.45 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2014 | 94.8% | $5.27 Billion | $273.50 Million | $10.75 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 93.9% | $4.48 Billion | $274.80 Million | $11.52 Billion | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2012 | 97.2% | $5.11 Billion | $143.70 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 97.4% | $4.39 Billion | $111.90 Million | $7.36 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 98.1% | $3.68 Billion | $70.80 Million | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 97.8% | $3.05 Billion | $68.20 Million | $5.58 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2008 | 97.3% | $2.51 Billion | $66.60 Million | $5.67 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2007 | 98.2% | $2.30 Billion | $42.04 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2006 | 98.3% | $2.23 Billion | $37.95 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 98.3% | $2.09 Billion | $35.41 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2004 | 96.1% | $2.49 Billion | $95.75 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2003 | 95.8% | $2.08 Billion | $88.29 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2002 | 98.3% | $1.73 Billion | $29.76 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2001 | 98.4% | $1.38 Billion | $21.84 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2000 | 98.2% | $1.15 Billion | $21.31 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 1999 | 98.5% | $961.00 Million | $14.20 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $794.30 Million | $0.00 | $992.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $531.80 Million | $0.00 | $850.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $451.70 Million | $0.00 | $726.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $312.20 Million | $0.00 | $468.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $109.90 Million | $0.00 | $231.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $88.10 Million | $0.00 | $193.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $75.30 Million | $0.00 | $87.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $22.10 Million | $0.00 | $37.80 Million | — |