Socket Mobile Inc (SCKT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Socket Mobile Inc (SCKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $350.41K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.73 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Socket Mobile Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Socket Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Socket Mobile Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Socket Mobile Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Socket Mobile Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Socket Mobile Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SCKT company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -123.03x | $-1.25 Billion | $10.16 Million | ▼ -216594.1% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-521.49K | $9.19 Million | ▼ -1189.8% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $48.56K | $9.32 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-111.42K | $8.28 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $2.14 Million | $5.53 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $804.45K | $4.44 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $873.53K | $6.22 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $750.14K | $4.93 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2017 | 0.91x | $2.38 Million | $2.62 Million | ▲ +2024.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $879.82K | $20.64 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.35 Million | $9.69 Million | ▲ +2138.7% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $52.21K | $8.37 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-93.90K | $8.10 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | $-907.46K | $7.92 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2011 | -0.16x | $-1.19 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-638.52K | $6.17 Million | ▼ -530.0% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $158.79K | $6.60 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-1.98 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-1.14 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -137.2% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-399.55K | $7.04 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $2.18 Million | $6.82 Million | ▲ +495.2% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-603.24K | $7.45 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-729.04K | $6.77 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2002 | -0.21x | $-1.86 Million | $8.67 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | $-4.22 Million | $5.03 Million | ▼ -131.4% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | $-1.69 Million | $4.65 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | -0.70x | $-1.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | -0.64x | $-1.52 Million | $2.37 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 1997 | -0.44x | $-2.17 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 1996 | -1.33x | $-3.05 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1995 | -1.68x | $-3.20 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-3.10 Million | $3.60 Million | — |