Socket Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Socket Mobile Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Socket Mobile Inc (SCKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $135.95K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.99 Million) in one year. Check SCKT cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Socket Mobile Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Socket Mobile Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Socket Mobile Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Socket Mobile Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Socket Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Socket Mobile Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Socket Mobile Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SCKT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-1.25 Million | $10.16 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-521.49K | $9.19 Million | ▼ -1189.8% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $48.56K | $9.32 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-111.42K | $8.28 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $2.14 Million | $5.53 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $804.45K | $4.44 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $873.53K | $6.22 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $750.14K | $4.93 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2017 | 0.91x | $2.38 Million | $2.62 Million | ▲ +2024.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $879.82K | $20.64 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.35 Million | $9.69 Million | ▲ +2138.7% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $52.21K | $8.37 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-93.90K | $8.10 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | $-907.46K | $7.92 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2011 | -0.16x | $-1.19 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-638.52K | $6.17 Million | ▼ -566.6% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $146.34K | $6.60 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-1.98 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-1.14 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -137.2% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-399.55K | $7.04 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $2.18 Million | $6.82 Million | ▲ +495.2% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-603.24K | $7.45 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-729.04K | $6.77 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | $-1.89 Million | $8.67 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | $-4.22 Million | $5.03 Million | ▼ -131.4% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | $-1.69 Million | $4.65 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | -0.70x | $-1.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | -0.64x | $-1.52 Million | $2.37 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 1997 | -0.44x | $-2.17 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 1996 | -1.33x | $-3.05 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1995 | -1.68x | $-3.20 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-3.10 Million | $3.60 Million | — |