Socket Mobile Inc (SCKT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Socket Mobile Inc (SCKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $135.95K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.99 Million) in one year. See SCKT free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Socket Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Socket Mobile Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Socket Mobile Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Socket Mobile Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Socket Mobile Inc. Check Socket Mobile Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-1.25 Million | $10.16 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-521.49K | $9.19 Million | ▼ -1189.8% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $48.56K | $9.32 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-111.42K | $8.28 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $2.14 Million | $5.53 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $804.45K | $4.44 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $873.53K | $6.22 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $750.14K | $4.93 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2017 | 0.91x | $2.38 Million | $2.62 Million | ▲ +2024.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $879.82K | $20.64 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.35 Million | $9.69 Million | ▲ +2138.7% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $52.21K | $8.37 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-93.90K | $8.10 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | $-907.46K | $7.92 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2011 | -0.16x | $-1.19 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-638.52K | $6.17 Million | ▼ -566.6% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $146.34K | $6.60 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-1.98 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-1.14 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -137.2% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-399.55K | $7.04 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $2.18 Million | $6.82 Million | ▲ +495.2% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-603.24K | $7.45 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-729.04K | $6.77 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | $-1.89 Million | $8.67 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | $-4.22 Million | $5.03 Million | ▼ -131.4% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | $-1.69 Million | $4.65 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | -0.70x | $-1.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1998 | -0.64x | $-1.52 Million | $2.37 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 1997 | -0.44x | $-2.17 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 1996 | -1.33x | $-3.05 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1995 | -1.68x | $-3.20 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-3.10 Million | $3.60 Million | — |