Shoe Carnival Inc (SCVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shoe Carnival Inc (SCVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($485.68 Million) in one year. Check Shoe Carnival Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Shoe Carnival Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Shoe Carnival Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Shoe Carnival Inc (SCVL) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shoe Carnival Inc (1993–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shoe Carnival Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Shoe Carnival Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $71.30 Million | $512.08 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2025 | 0.22x | $102.64 Million | $475.14 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $122.76 Million | $458.64 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $50.44 Million | $464.21 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $147.89 Million | $359.73 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $63.40 Million | $332.57 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $66.95 Million | $331.01 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 0.65x | $74.14 Million | $113.57 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $40.35 Million | $108.28 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | $63.79 Million | $139.60 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $58.55 Million | $141.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $57.65 Million | $133.82 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $38.62 Million | $119.98 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $25.85 Million | $114.83 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $30.88 Million | $102.88 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $29.42 Million | $90.80 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $27.90 Million | $89.81 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $32.08 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $19.88 Million | $95.00 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $29.27 Million | $101.21 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $33.69 Million | $93.68 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $29.13 Million | $99.99 Million | ▲ +282.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $7.86 Million | $103.17 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $27.72 Million | $88.38 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $22.33 Million | $89.82 Million | ▲ +627.8% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $3.11 Million | $91.04 Million | ▲ +568.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $355.00K | $69.51 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 1999 | 0.49x | $18.60 Million | $38.10 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $16.60 Million | $30.10 Million | ▲ +218.2% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $7.40 Million | $42.70 Million | ▲ +146.9% |
| 1995 | -0.37x | $-13.90 Million | $37.60 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-11.50 Million | $13.30 Million | ▼ -1472.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $2.30 Million | $36.50 Million | — |