SPAR Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SPAR Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. SPAR Group Inc (SGRP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.06 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($45.08 Million) in one year. Check SPAR Group Inc (SGRP) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SPAR Group Inc (1995–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SPAR Group Inc from 1995 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for SPAR Group Inc across 30 annual periods. Check SPAR Group Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SPAR Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2024)
SPAR Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SPAR Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SPAR Group Inc (SGRP) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-665.00K | $32.12 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $6.82 Million | $50.03 Million | ▲ +252.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-5.04 Million | $56.54 Million | ▼ -275.3% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $2.63 Million | $51.67 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $8.80 Million | $45.41 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $6.15 Million | $49.96 Million | ▲ +166.0% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $2.05 Million | $44.32 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $6.77 Million | $32.43 Million | ▲ +400.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $1.34 Million | $32.16 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $4.89 Million | $19.01 Million | ▲ +162.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $2.10 Million | $21.36 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $2.88 Million | $15.72 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $3.44 Million | $14.54 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $3.54 Million | $11.11 Million | ▲ +189.1% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $1.41 Million | $12.82 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $1.41 Million | $12.82 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $2.25 Million | $16.88 Million | ▲ +18133.0% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $12.00K | $16.42 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | $-2.47 Million | $13.04 Million | ▼ -156.2% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $3.42 Million | $10.16 Million | ▲ +189.8% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $1.38 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $3.36 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2002 | 0.97x | $12.71 Million | $13.16 Million | ▲ +12108.7% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-243.00K | $30.22 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $6.33 Million | $43.38 Million | ▲ +253.2% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-4.97 Million | $52.20 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1998 | -0.30x | $-3.40 Million | $11.40 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 1997 | -0.16x | $-2.80 Million | $17.80 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-1.70 Million | $11.00 Million | ▼ -420.3% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-300.00K | $10.10 Million | — |