Silicom (SILC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicom (SILC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.03 Million) in one year. See SILC free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Silicom Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicom across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Silicom growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silicom (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicom. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Silicom market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-2.16 Million | $35.03 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2024 | 0.81x | $18.29 Million | $22.57 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2023 | 1.64x | $31.93 Million | $19.47 Million | ▲ +1579.3% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-4.09 Million | $36.90 Million | ▼ -728.0% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $1.08 Million | $61.14 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.96 Million | $41.05 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2019 | 0.83x | $26.73 Million | $32.14 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2018 | 1.89x | $45.68 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +2830.1% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $1.41 Million | $21.81 Million | ▲ +159.7% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | $-2.71 Million | $25.05 Million | ▼ -122.1% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $13.29 Million | $27.16 Million | ▼ -48.7% |
| 2014 | 0.95x | $20.68 Million | $21.70 Million | ▲ +623.7% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $1.92 Million | $14.57 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2012 | 0.63x | $8.89 Million | $14.07 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $4.69 Million | $8.59 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | $3.24 Million | $8.05 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2009 | 0.60x | $3.83 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $5.76 Million | $6.64 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $3.67 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $2.00 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +4468.1% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $41.00K | $4.37 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | $-1.54 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2003 | -0.73x | $-1.41 Million | $1.94 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-956.00K | $1.72 Million | ▼ -11921.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $7.00K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +100.9% |
| 2000 | -0.53x | $-1.34 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -162.2% |
| 1999 | 0.86x | $1.28 Million | $1.49 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1998 | 0.80x | $1.06 Million | $1.33 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $1.00 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +247.4% |
| 1996 | -0.36x | $-500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.22x | $-200.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -133.3% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $600.00K | $900.00K | — |