Silicom Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicom cash flow-to-debt ratio. Silicom (SILC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.03 Million) in one year. Check SILC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Silicom (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Silicom from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicom across 32 annual periods. Check SILC cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Silicom Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Silicom cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicom. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Silicom.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-2.16 Million | $35.03 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2024 | 0.81x | $18.29 Million | $22.57 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2023 | 1.64x | $31.93 Million | $19.47 Million | ▲ +1579.3% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-4.09 Million | $36.90 Million | ▼ -728.0% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $1.08 Million | $61.14 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.96 Million | $41.05 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2019 | 0.83x | $26.73 Million | $32.14 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2018 | 1.89x | $45.68 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +2830.1% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $1.41 Million | $21.81 Million | ▲ +159.7% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | $-2.71 Million | $25.05 Million | ▼ -122.1% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $13.29 Million | $27.16 Million | ▼ -48.7% |
| 2014 | 0.95x | $20.68 Million | $21.70 Million | ▲ +623.7% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $1.92 Million | $14.57 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2012 | 0.63x | $8.89 Million | $14.07 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $4.69 Million | $8.59 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | $3.24 Million | $8.05 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2009 | 0.60x | $3.83 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $5.76 Million | $6.64 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $3.67 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $2.00 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +4468.1% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $41.00K | $4.37 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | $-1.54 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2003 | -0.73x | $-1.41 Million | $1.94 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-956.00K | $1.72 Million | ▼ -11921.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $7.00K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +100.9% |
| 2000 | -0.53x | $-1.34 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -162.2% |
| 1999 | 0.86x | $1.28 Million | $1.49 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1998 | 0.80x | $1.06 Million | $1.33 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $1.00 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +247.4% |
| 1996 | -0.36x | $-500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.22x | $-200.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -133.3% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $600.00K | $900.00K | — |