Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.27 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Sleep Number Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sleep Number Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sleep Number Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore SNBR asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sleep Number Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sleep Number Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Sleep Number Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-3.28 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $27.14 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +419.1% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-9.03 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -125.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $36.14 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -88.4% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $300.01 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $279.66 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $189.16 Million | $965.47 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $131.54 Million | $579.69 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | $172.61 Million | $382.68 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $151.65 Million | $296.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2015 | 0.37x | $107.94 Million | $291.06 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $144.47 Million | $217.28 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | $88.11 Million | $156.54 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | $100.63 Million | $148.32 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.68x | $91.05 Million | $133.27 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2010 | 0.64x | $71.22 Million | $111.98 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2009 | 0.70x | $66.64 Million | $95.78 Million | ▲ +4043.1% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $2.97 Million | $177.04 Million | ▼ -93.7% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $44.03 Million | $166.36 Million | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $59.38 Million | $113.27 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2005 | 0.81x | $87.50 Million | $107.49 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2004 | 0.68x | $52.48 Million | $77.47 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | 0.85x | $49.20 Million | $57.94 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $36.14 Million | $53.82 Million | ▲ +9717.7% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $415.00K | $60.66 Million | ▲ +103.2% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-10.29 Million | $48.07 Million | ▼ -218.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $7.70 Million | $42.50 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $11.00 Million | $35.50 Million | ▲ +114.8% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $7.30 Million | $50.60 Million | — |