Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 63.8% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($13.04 Million) from net assets ($36.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Sleep Number Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Sleep Number Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2017)
This chart shows how Sleep Number Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 1997 to 2017. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at 63.8%, reflecting net assets of $36.00 Million with intangible assets of $13.04 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Sleep Number Corp stock valuation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sleep Number Corp (1997–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sleep Number Corp from 1997 to 2017, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore how much does Sleep Number Corp reinvest in capital to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 84.8% | $89.16 Million | $13.59 Million | $471.83 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 89.5% | $160.32 Million | $16.77 Million | $457.17 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.3% | $222.34 Million | $19.30 Million | $513.40 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2014 | 97.3% | $256.91 Million | $7.02 Million | $474.19 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 96.5% | $225.22 Million | $7.86 Million | $381.76 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 95.9% | $193.70 Million | $7.86 Million | $342.02 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $129.39 Million | $2.90 Million | $262.66 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.0% | $57.98 Million | $2.90 Million | $169.96 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2009 | 87.1% | $22.46 Million | $2.90 Million | $118.24 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2007 | 88.0% | $24.13 Million | $2.90 Million | $190.49 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2006 | 97.5% | $115.69 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.96 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.7% | $121.35 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.83 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.4% | $114.34 Million | $8.64 Million | $191.81 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 92.6% | $92.76 Million | $6.82 Million | $150.70 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2002 | 94.8% | $54.52 Million | $2.85 Million | $108.33 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $6.77 Million | $0.00 | $67.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $16.60 Million | $0.00 | $64.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $53.40 Million | $0.00 | $95.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $70.70 Million | $0.00 | $106.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $6.60 Million | $0.00 | $57.20 Million | — |