Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 63.8% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($13.04 Million) from net assets ($36.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Sleep Number Corp working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Sleep Number Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2017)
This chart shows how Sleep Number Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 1997 to 2017. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at 63.8%, reflecting net assets of $36.00 Million with intangible assets of $13.04 Million USD. See how many days can Sleep Number Corp fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sleep Number Corp (1997–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sleep Number Corp from 1997 to 2017, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Sleep Number Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 84.8% | $89.16 Million | $13.59 Million | $471.83 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 89.5% | $160.32 Million | $16.77 Million | $457.17 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.3% | $222.34 Million | $19.30 Million | $513.40 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2014 | 97.3% | $256.91 Million | $7.02 Million | $474.19 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 96.5% | $225.22 Million | $7.86 Million | $381.76 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 95.9% | $193.70 Million | $7.86 Million | $342.02 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $129.39 Million | $2.90 Million | $262.66 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.0% | $57.98 Million | $2.90 Million | $169.96 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2009 | 87.1% | $22.46 Million | $2.90 Million | $118.24 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2007 | 88.0% | $24.13 Million | $2.90 Million | $190.49 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2006 | 97.5% | $115.69 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.96 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.7% | $121.35 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.83 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.4% | $114.34 Million | $8.64 Million | $191.81 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 92.6% | $92.76 Million | $6.82 Million | $150.70 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2002 | 94.8% | $54.52 Million | $2.85 Million | $108.33 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $6.77 Million | $0.00 | $67.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $16.60 Million | $0.00 | $64.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $53.40 Million | $0.00 | $95.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $70.70 Million | $0.00 | $106.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $6.60 Million | $0.00 | $57.20 Million | — |