Sleep Number Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sleep Number Corp tangible net worth ratio. Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 63.8% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($13.04 Million) from net assets ($36.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore SNBR net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Sleep Number Corp (1997–2017)
Tangible net worth ratio of Sleep Number Corp from 1997 to 2017. This chart shows how Sleep Number Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 1997 to 2017. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at 63.8%, reflecting net assets of $36.00 Million with intangible assets of $13.04 Million USD. Check SNBR strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Sleep Number Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1997–2017)
Sleep Number Corp tangible net worth ratio by year from 1997 to 2017. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sleep Number Corp from 1997 to 2017, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Sleep Number Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 84.8% | $89.16 Million | $13.59 Million | $471.83 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 89.5% | $160.32 Million | $16.77 Million | $457.17 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.3% | $222.34 Million | $19.30 Million | $513.40 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2014 | 97.3% | $256.91 Million | $7.02 Million | $474.19 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 96.5% | $225.22 Million | $7.86 Million | $381.76 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 95.9% | $193.70 Million | $7.86 Million | $342.02 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $129.39 Million | $2.90 Million | $262.66 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.0% | $57.98 Million | $2.90 Million | $169.96 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2009 | 87.1% | $22.46 Million | $2.90 Million | $118.24 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2007 | 88.0% | $24.13 Million | $2.90 Million | $190.49 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2006 | 97.5% | $115.69 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.96 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.7% | $121.35 Million | $2.85 Million | $228.83 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.4% | $114.34 Million | $8.64 Million | $191.81 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 92.6% | $92.76 Million | $6.82 Million | $150.70 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2002 | 94.8% | $54.52 Million | $2.85 Million | $108.33 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $6.77 Million | $0.00 | $67.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $16.60 Million | $0.00 | $64.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $53.40 Million | $0.00 | $95.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $70.70 Million | $0.00 | $106.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $6.60 Million | $0.00 | $57.20 Million | — |