Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Sleep Number Corp (SNBR) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 567.6% as of March 2018. Strategic assets (PP&E of $204.33 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $204.33 Million, measured against net assets of $36.00 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Sleep Number Corp Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2017)
This chart shows how Sleep Number Corp's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2000 to 2017. As of March 2018, the index stands at 567.6%, representing strategic assets of $204.33 Million against net assets of $36.00 Million USD. Explore SNBR cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Sleep Number Corp (2000–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Sleep Number Corp from 2000 to 2017, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see SNBR market cap overview.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 234.0% | $208.65 Million | $208.65 Million | $- | $89.16 Million | ▲ +104.1 pp |
| 2016 | 130.0% | $208.37 Million | $208.37 Million | $0.00 | $160.32 Million | ▲ +34.2 pp |
| 2015 | 95.8% | $212.93 Million | $204.38 Million | $8.55 Million | $222.34 Million | ▲ +14.1 pp |
| 2014 | 81.7% | $209.89 Million | $165.45 Million | $44.44 Million | $256.91 Million | ▲ +24.2 pp |
| 2013 | 57.5% | $129.54 Million | $129.54 Million | $- | $225.22 Million | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2012 | 41.0% | $79.36 Million | $79.36 Million | $- | $193.70 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2011 | 33.9% | $43.85 Million | $43.85 Million | $- | $129.39 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2010 | 56.8% | $32.95 Million | $32.95 Million | $- | $57.98 Million | ▼ -111.0 pp |
| 2009 | 167.8% | $37.68 Million | $37.68 Million | $- | $22.46 Million | ▼ -165.5 pp |
| 2007 | 333.3% | $80.41 Million | $80.41 Million | $- | $24.13 Million | ▲ +282.0 pp |
| 2006 | 51.3% | $59.38 Million | $59.38 Million | $- | $115.69 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2005 | 44.4% | $53.87 Million | $53.87 Million | $- | $121.35 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2004 | 38.4% | $43.91 Million | $43.91 Million | $- | $114.34 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2003 | 39.0% | $36.13 Million | $36.13 Million | $- | $92.76 Million | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2002 | 53.2% | $28.98 Million | $28.98 Million | $- | $54.52 Million | ▼ -402.9 pp |
| 2001 | 456.0% | $30.88 Million | $30.88 Million | $- | $6.77 Million | ▲ +232.8 pp |
| 2000 | 223.3% | $37.06 Million | $37.06 Million | $- | $16.60 Million | — |