Sterling Construction Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sterling Construction Company Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.59 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Sterling Construction Company Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sterling Construction Company Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sterling Construction Company Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sterling Construction Company Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Sterling Construction Company Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Sterling Construction Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Sterling Construction Company Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sterling Construction Company Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Sterling Construction Company Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $439.99 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $497.10 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $478.58 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $219.12 Million | $991.13 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $158.93 Million | $901.45 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $122.90 Million | $713.66 Million | ▲ +205.3% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $41.09 Million | $728.56 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $39.47 Million | $310.31 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $23.01 Million | $317.11 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $44.50 Million | $193.73 Million | ▲ +336.4% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.97 Million | $170.41 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-10.51 Million | $165.30 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-21.56 Million | $153.97 Million | ▼ -167.2% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $24.79 Million | $118.92 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $20.99 Million | $72.14 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2010 | 0.54x | $47.07 Million | $87.98 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $47.87 Million | $131.09 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $26.72 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $29.54 Million | $132.47 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $23.71 Million | $78.23 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $31.27 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +742.5% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $2.94 Million | $56.54 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $17.80 Million | $53.67 Million | ▲ +278.6% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $5.11 Million | $58.28 Million | ▲ +2156.3% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-214.00K | $50.23 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-238.00K | $20.93 Million | ▲ +84.5% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-900.00K | $12.29 Million | ▼ -281.9% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $554.00K | $13.76 Million | ▲ +490.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-157.00K | $15.22 Million | — |