Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.59 Billion) in one year. See STRL FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sterling Construction Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sterling Construction Company Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Sterling Construction Company Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sterling Construction Company Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sterling Construction Company Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sterling Construction Company Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $439.99 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $497.10 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $478.58 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $219.12 Million | $991.13 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $158.93 Million | $901.45 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $122.90 Million | $713.66 Million | ▲ +205.3% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $41.09 Million | $728.56 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $39.47 Million | $310.31 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $23.01 Million | $317.11 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $44.50 Million | $193.73 Million | ▲ +336.4% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.97 Million | $170.41 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-10.51 Million | $165.30 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-21.56 Million | $153.97 Million | ▼ -167.2% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $24.79 Million | $118.92 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $20.99 Million | $72.14 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2010 | 0.54x | $47.07 Million | $87.98 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $47.87 Million | $131.09 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $26.72 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $29.54 Million | $132.47 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $23.71 Million | $78.23 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $31.27 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +742.5% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $2.94 Million | $56.54 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $17.80 Million | $53.67 Million | ▲ +278.6% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $5.11 Million | $58.28 Million | ▲ +2156.3% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-214.00K | $50.23 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-238.00K | $20.93 Million | ▲ +84.5% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-900.00K | $12.29 Million | ▼ -281.9% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $554.00K | $13.76 Million | ▲ +490.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-157.00K | $15.22 Million | — |