Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.59 Billion) in one year. Explore Sterling Construction Company Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sterling Construction Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sterling Construction Company Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore STRL total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sterling Construction Company Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sterling Construction Company Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $439.99 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $497.10 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $478.58 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $219.12 Million | $991.13 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $158.93 Million | $901.45 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $122.90 Million | $713.66 Million | ▲ +205.3% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $41.09 Million | $728.56 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $39.47 Million | $310.31 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $23.01 Million | $317.11 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $44.50 Million | $193.73 Million | ▲ +336.4% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.97 Million | $170.41 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-10.51 Million | $165.30 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-21.56 Million | $153.97 Million | ▼ -167.2% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $24.79 Million | $118.92 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $20.99 Million | $72.14 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2010 | 0.54x | $47.07 Million | $87.98 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $47.87 Million | $131.09 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $26.72 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $29.54 Million | $132.47 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $23.71 Million | $78.23 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $31.27 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +742.5% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $2.94 Million | $56.54 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $17.80 Million | $53.67 Million | ▲ +278.6% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $5.11 Million | $58.28 Million | ▲ +2156.3% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-214.00K | $50.23 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-419.00K | $25.22 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-238.00K | $20.93 Million | ▲ +84.5% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-900.00K | $12.29 Million | ▼ -281.9% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $554.00K | $13.76 Million | ▲ +490.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-157.00K | $15.22 Million | — |