Sterling Construction Company Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Sterling Construction Company Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Sterling Construction Company Inc (STRL) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 9.3% as of March 2026. Working capital of $110.94 Million (current assets of $1.19 Billion minus current liabilities of $1.08 Billion) is measured against net assets of $1.20 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check STRL tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Sterling Construction Company Inc (1995–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Sterling Construction Company Inc from 1995 to 2025. This chart shows how Sterling Construction Company Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 9.3%, reflecting working capital of $110.94 Million against net assets of $1.20 Billion USD. See Sterling Construction Company Inc liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Sterling Construction Company Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Sterling Construction Company Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Sterling Construction Company Inc from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Sterling Construction Company Inc.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.1% | $12.01 Million | $1.11 Billion | $1.03 Billion | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -32.8 pp |
| 2024 | 33.9% | $279.92 Million | $826.48 Million | $1.02 Billion | $741.96 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2023 | 27.2% | $169.81 Million | $623.85 Million | $847.98 Million | $678.17 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2022 | 31.5% | $150.64 Million | $477.80 Million | $597.25 Million | $446.61 Million | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2021 | 23.0% | $82.93 Million | $360.23 Million | $434.69 Million | $351.76 Million | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2020 | 14.8% | $39.66 Million | $268.73 Million | $361.54 Million | $321.88 Million | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2019 | 28.9% | $64.02 Million | $221.21 Million | $357.52 Million | $293.50 Million | ▼ -42.7 pp |
| 2018 | 71.7% | $123.44 Million | $172.26 Million | $302.62 Million | $179.17 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2017 | 65.8% | $96.23 Million | $146.19 Million | $278.53 Million | $182.29 Million | ▲ +38.7 pp |
| 2016 | 27.1% | $29.32 Million | $108.09 Million | $175.91 Million | $146.59 Million | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2015 | 31.6% | $30.27 Million | $95.75 Million | $134.92 Million | $104.65 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2014 | 37.1% | $52.32 Million | $141.15 Million | $156.97 Million | $104.65 Million | ▲ +30.5 pp |
| 2013 | 6.5% | $8.69 Million | $132.79 Million | $114.48 Million | $105.80 Million | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2012 | 41.2% | $87.48 Million | $212.59 Million | $164.76 Million | $77.27 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 40.9% | $94.74 Million | $231.69 Million | $164.02 Million | $69.28 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2010 | 38.4% | $107.28 Million | $279.15 Million | $176.33 Million | $69.05 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2009 | 44.7% | $113.88 Million | $254.65 Million | $189.19 Million | $75.31 Million | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2008 | 57.5% | $95.12 Million | $165.42 Million | $152.72 Million | $57.60 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2007 | 56.6% | $82.06 Million | $144.97 Million | $142.95 Million | $60.89 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2006 | 69.1% | $62.87 Million | $90.99 Million | $107.41 Million | $44.53 Million | ▲ +31.3 pp |
| 2005 | 37.8% | $18.35 Million | $48.61 Million | $73.63 Million | $55.27 Million | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2004 | 44.7% | $15.75 Million | $35.21 Million | $48.08 Million | $32.32 Million | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2003 | 29.6% | $6.49 Million | $21.91 Million | $40.20 Million | $33.71 Million | ▼ -51.6 pp |
| 2002 | 81.2% | $11.75 Million | $14.47 Million | $35.71 Million | $23.96 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2001 | 92.7% | $8.25 Million | $8.91 Million | $28.25 Million | $19.99 Million | ▲ +66.0 pp |
| 2000 | 26.7% | $-1.01 Million | $-3.79 Million | $10.78 Million | $11.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 26.7% | $-1.01 Million | $-3.79 Million | $10.78 Million | $11.79 Million | ▲ +155.4 pp |
| 1998 | -128.7% | $977.00K | $-759.00K | $9.57 Million | $8.59 Million | ▼ -284.7 pp |
| 1997 | 156.0% | $2.72 Million | $1.74 Million | $10.69 Million | $7.97 Million | ▲ +43.4 pp |
| 1996 | 112.6% | $2.42 Million | $2.15 Million | $10.46 Million | $8.05 Million | ▲ +55.9 pp |
| 1995 | 56.7% | $6.18 Million | $10.90 Million | $13.83 Million | $7.65 Million | — |