Smith & Wesson Brands Inc (SWBI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith & Wesson Brands Inc (SWBI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $27.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($185.39 Million) in one year. See SWBI cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith & Wesson Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith & Wesson Brands Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore Smith & Wesson Brands Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith & Wesson Brands Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Smith & Wesson Brands Inc (SWBI) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-7.22 Million | $187.16 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2024 | 0.60x | $106.74 Million | $177.51 Million | ▲ +463.0% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $16.73 Million | $156.67 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2022 | 1.01x | $137.81 Million | $136.96 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2021 | 1.75x | $315.33 Million | $180.00 Million | ▲ +530.6% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $94.96 Million | $341.84 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $57.45 Million | $322.35 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $61.64 Million | $322.91 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | $123.58 Million | $394.87 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2016 | 0.54x | $168.56 Million | $311.69 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $114.81 Million | $296.56 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $90.21 Million | $214.68 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 0.67x | $98.10 Million | $145.69 Million | ▲ +164.8% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $37.85 Million | $148.83 Million | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $39.29 Million | $188.76 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $23.09 Million | $188.47 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $53.06 Million | $159.60 Million | ▲ +1073.4% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $6.00 Million | $211.90 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $15.81 Million | $209.15 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $12.45 Million | $53.36 Million | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $6.44 Million | $54.90 Million | ▲ +1000.4% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $906.70K | $85.03 Million | ▲ +164.3% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-1.52 Million | $91.50 Million | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $3.30 Million | $97.60 Million | ▲ +101.7% |
| 2001 | -2.02x | $-1.74 Million | $859.24K | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2000 | -2.91x | $-1.09 Million | $374.04K | — |