Tandy Leather Factory Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tandy Leather Factory Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tandy Leather Factory Inc (TLF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.65 Million) in one year. Check Tandy Leather Factory Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tandy Leather Factory Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tandy Leather Factory Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tandy Leather Factory Inc across 33 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Tandy Leather Factory Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tandy Leather Factory Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Tandy Leather Factory Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tandy Leather Factory Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tandy Leather Factory Inc (TLF) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-556.00K | $34.04 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $4.55 Million | $17.77 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $4.54 Million | $15.79 Million | ▲ +326.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.15 Million | $17.12 Million | ▼ -60.8% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $3.72 Million | $21.58 Million | ▲ +133.2% |
| 2020 | -0.52x | $-12.53 Million | $24.18 Million | ▼ -217.2% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $10.47 Million | $23.69 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $6.86 Million | $16.68 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $3.02 Million | $15.38 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $7.54 Million | $16.92 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2015 | 0.60x | $8.20 Million | $13.59 Million | ▲ +604.2% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.18 Million | $13.75 Million | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2013 | 0.64x | $7.54 Million | $11.78 Million | ▲ +286.9% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $1.91 Million | $11.57 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $6.57 Million | $11.07 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $2.72 Million | $10.83 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $5.27 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $7.85 Million | $9.71 Million | ▲ +148.9% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $2.55 Million | $7.84 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $3.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $2.94 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2003 | 0.74x | $3.35 Million | $4.55 Million | ▲ +336.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $1.43 Million | $8.51 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $2.03 Million | $7.12 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | $3.90 Million | $9.39 Million | ▲ +1874.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $200.00K | $9.50 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $1.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $1.60 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1751.7% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $100.00K | $10.30 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $700.00K | $10.00 Million | ▲ +280.3% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-400.00K | $10.30 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $4.10 Million | — |