Tandy Leather Factory Inc (TLF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tandy Leather Factory Inc (TLF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $906.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.02 Million) in one year. See Tandy Leather Factory Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tandy Leather Factory Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tandy Leather Factory Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore TLF net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tandy Leather Factory Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tandy Leather Factory Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tandy Leather Factory Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-556.00K | $34.04 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $4.55 Million | $17.77 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $4.54 Million | $15.79 Million | ▲ +326.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.15 Million | $17.12 Million | ▼ -60.8% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $3.72 Million | $21.58 Million | ▲ +133.2% |
| 2020 | -0.52x | $-12.53 Million | $24.18 Million | ▼ -217.2% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $10.47 Million | $23.69 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $6.86 Million | $16.68 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $3.02 Million | $15.38 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $7.54 Million | $16.92 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2015 | 0.60x | $8.20 Million | $13.59 Million | ▲ +604.2% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.18 Million | $13.75 Million | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2013 | 0.64x | $7.54 Million | $11.78 Million | ▲ +286.9% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $1.91 Million | $11.57 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $6.57 Million | $11.07 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $2.72 Million | $10.83 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $5.27 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $7.85 Million | $9.71 Million | ▲ +148.9% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $2.55 Million | $7.84 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $3.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $1.54 Million | $4.42 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $2.94 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2003 | 0.74x | $3.35 Million | $4.55 Million | ▲ +336.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $1.43 Million | $8.51 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $2.03 Million | $7.12 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | $3.90 Million | $9.39 Million | ▲ +1874.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $200.00K | $9.50 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $1.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $1.60 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1751.7% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $100.00K | $10.30 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $700.00K | $10.00 Million | ▲ +280.3% |
| 1994 | -0.04x | $-400.00K | $10.30 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $4.10 Million | — |