Trinity Biotech plc (TRIB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trinity Biotech plc (TRIB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-71.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.43 Million) in one year. See TRIB free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Trinity Biotech plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Trinity Biotech plc across 32 annual periods. Also explore TRIB net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Trinity Biotech plc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trinity Biotech plc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TRIB market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-4.19 Million | $138.47 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | $-11.56 Million | $83.38 Million | ▼ -1318.8% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-921.00K | $94.28 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $13.24 Million | $119.21 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $23.75 Million | $132.62 Million | ▲ +313.5% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $5.47 Million | $126.36 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $6.93 Million | $107.18 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $12.11 Million | $127.42 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $13.77 Million | $140.87 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $12.34 Million | $145.07 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $15.75 Million | $45.87 Million | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $11.71 Million | $43.48 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $20.06 Million | $28.03 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2011 | 1.02x | $20.48 Million | $20.17 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2010 | 1.18x | $23.07 Million | $19.59 Million | ▲ +324.6% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | $14.73 Million | $53.10 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $10.73 Million | $63.60 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $15.35 Million | $79.13 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $7.37 Million | $81.87 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $9.21 Million | $50.98 Million | ▲ +14818.8% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $42.00K | $34.69 Million | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $3.60 Million | $37.83 Million | ▼ -78.4% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | $11.65 Million | $26.36 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $5.06 Million | $20.50 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $3.02 Million | $12.19 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $3.82 Million | $22.32 Million | ▲ +620.5% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-1.00 Million | $30.40 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.40 Million | $17.50 Million | ▲ +93.8% |
| 1996 | -1.29x | $-3.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -173.2% |
| 1995 | -0.47x | $-800.00K | $1.70 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 1994 | -1.72x | $-3.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1993 | -1.33x | $-2.40 Million | $1.80 Million | — |