Trinity Biotech plc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Trinity Biotech plc tangible net worth ratio. Trinity Biotech plc (TRIB) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -144.9% as of June 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($38.74 Million) from net assets ($15.82 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset momentum of Trinity Biotech plc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Trinity Biotech plc (1993–2019)
Tangible net worth ratio of Trinity Biotech plc from 1993 to 2019. This chart shows how Trinity Biotech plc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1993 to 2019. As of June 2022, the ratio stands at -144.9%, reflecting net assets of $15.82 Million with intangible assets of $38.74 Million USD. Check Trinity Biotech plc strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Trinity Biotech plc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1993–2019)
Trinity Biotech plc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1993 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Trinity Biotech plc from 1993 to 2019, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see TRIB market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -559.1% | $4.71 Million | $31.06 Million | $131.07 Million | ▼ -575.5 pp |
| 2018 | 16.4% | $44.05 Million | $36.81 Million | $151.24 Million | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2017 | 28.1% | $65.20 Million | $46.86 Million | $192.62 Million | ▼ -15.3 pp |
| 2016 | 43.4% | $108.73 Million | $61.50 Million | $249.59 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2015 | 49.2% | $213.89 Million | $108.67 Million | $358.96 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2014 | 53.3% | $196.97 Million | $91.92 Million | $242.84 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2013 | 58.9% | $183.01 Million | $75.30 Million | $226.49 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2012 | 72.7% | $169.38 Million | $46.30 Million | $197.41 Million | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2011 | 83.0% | $151.33 Million | $25.76 Million | $171.50 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2010 | 86.3% | $141.29 Million | $19.42 Million | $160.87 Million | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2009 | 68.8% | $79.34 Million | $24.77 Million | $132.44 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2008 | 72.0% | $65.91 Million | $18.47 Million | $129.51 Million | ▲ +16.1 pp |
| 2007 | 55.8% | $136.84 Million | $60.44 Million | $215.98 Million | ▼ -17.2 pp |
| 2006 | 73.0% | $167.26 Million | $45.15 Million | $249.13 Million | ▲ +36.8 pp |
| 2005 | 36.2% | $133.62 Million | $85.20 Million | $184.60 Million | ▼ -13.9 pp |
| 2004 | 50.2% | $116.14 Million | $57.87 Million | $150.83 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2003 | 51.6% | $80.26 Million | $38.85 Million | $118.09 Million | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2002 | 37.0% | $62.91 Million | $39.61 Million | $89.27 Million | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2001 | 28.5% | $56.53 Million | $40.40 Million | $77.03 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2000 | 38.7% | $55.04 Million | $33.76 Million | $67.23 Million | ▲ +29.1 pp |
| 1999 | 9.5% | $22.72 Million | $20.56 Million | $45.04 Million | ▲ +32.1 pp |
| 1998 | -22.6% | $14.60 Million | $17.90 Million | $45.00 Million | ▼ -117.0 pp |
| 1997 | 94.4% | $7.10 Million | $400.00K | $24.60 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $10.60 Million | $0.00 | $13.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $7.50 Million | $0.00 | $9.20 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 1994 | 92.3% | $1.30 Million | $100.00K | $3.10 Million | ▲ +47.1 pp |
| 1993 | 45.2% | $3.10 Million | $1.70 Million | $4.90 Million | — |