Timberland Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timberland Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.74 Billion) in one year. Check TSBK cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Timberland Bancorp Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Timberland Bancorp Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Timberland Bancorp Inc across 29 annual periods. Check TSBK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Timberland Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Timberland Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timberland Bancorp Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Timberland Bancorp Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $30.16 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $23.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $31.00 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $29.64 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $33.86 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $18.11 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.45 Million | $893.63 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.86 Million | $841.02 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $11.82 Million | $794.55 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.62 Million | $726.63 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.62 Million | $662.79 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $11.57 Million | $655.96 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $15.39 Million | $646.63 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $10.70 Million | $652.02 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $6.04 Million | $657.28 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $11.47 Million | $614.48 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $9.95 Million | $607.04 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $11.39 Million | $570.30 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $7.76 Million | $497.72 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $7.60 Million | $478.12 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $7.50 Million | $387.60 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $9.75 Million | $372.02 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $11.12 Million | $356.66 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $7.88 Million | $314.50 Million | ▲ +389.8% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $295.77 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-7.10 Million | $234.90 Million | ▼ -794.8% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $800.00K | $183.90 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $5.58 Million | $186.91 Million | — |