Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.74 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Timberland Bancorp Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Timberland Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Timberland Bancorp Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Timberland Bancorp Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Timberland Bancorp Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timberland Bancorp Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TSBK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $30.16 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $23.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $31.00 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $29.64 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $33.86 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $18.11 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.45 Million | $893.63 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.86 Million | $841.02 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $11.82 Million | $794.55 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.62 Million | $726.63 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.62 Million | $662.79 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $11.57 Million | $655.96 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $15.39 Million | $646.63 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $10.70 Million | $652.02 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $6.04 Million | $657.28 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $11.47 Million | $614.48 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $9.95 Million | $607.04 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $11.39 Million | $570.30 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $7.76 Million | $497.72 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $7.60 Million | $478.12 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $7.50 Million | $387.60 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $9.75 Million | $372.02 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $11.12 Million | $356.66 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $7.88 Million | $314.50 Million | ▲ +389.8% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $295.77 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-7.10 Million | $234.90 Million | ▼ -794.8% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $800.00K | $183.90 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $5.58 Million | $186.91 Million | — |