Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.74 Billion) in one year. See financial agility of Timberland Bancorp Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Timberland Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Timberland Bancorp Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Timberland Bancorp Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timberland Bancorp Inc. Check TSBK cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $30.16 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $23.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $31.00 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $29.64 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $33.86 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $18.11 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.45 Million | $893.63 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.86 Million | $841.02 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $11.82 Million | $794.55 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.62 Million | $726.63 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.62 Million | $662.79 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $11.57 Million | $655.96 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $15.39 Million | $646.63 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $10.70 Million | $652.02 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $6.04 Million | $657.28 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $11.47 Million | $614.48 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $9.95 Million | $607.04 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $11.39 Million | $570.30 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $7.76 Million | $497.72 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $7.60 Million | $478.12 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $7.50 Million | $387.60 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $9.75 Million | $372.02 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $11.12 Million | $356.66 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $7.88 Million | $314.50 Million | ▲ +389.8% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $295.77 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-7.10 Million | $234.90 Million | ▼ -794.8% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $800.00K | $183.90 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $5.58 Million | $186.91 Million | — |