Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.74 Billion) in one year. See TSBK free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Timberland Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Timberland Bancorp Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore TSBK year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Timberland Bancorp Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timberland Bancorp Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TSBK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $30.16 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $23.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $31.00 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $29.64 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $33.86 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $18.11 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.45 Million | $893.63 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.86 Million | $841.02 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $11.82 Million | $794.55 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.62 Million | $726.63 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.62 Million | $662.79 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $11.57 Million | $655.96 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $15.39 Million | $646.63 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $10.70 Million | $652.02 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $6.04 Million | $657.28 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $11.47 Million | $614.48 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $9.95 Million | $607.04 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $11.39 Million | $570.30 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $7.76 Million | $497.72 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $7.60 Million | $478.12 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $7.50 Million | $387.60 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $9.75 Million | $372.02 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $11.12 Million | $356.66 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $7.88 Million | $314.50 Million | ▲ +389.8% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $295.77 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-7.10 Million | $234.90 Million | ▼ -794.8% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $800.00K | $183.90 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $5.58 Million | $186.91 Million | — |