Viatris Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Viatris Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Viatris Inc (VTRS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $381.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.78 Billion) in one year. Check VTRS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Viatris Inc (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Viatris Inc from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Viatris Inc across 38 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Viatris Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Viatris Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Viatris Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Viatris Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see VTRS cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $2.32 Billion | $22.48 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $2.30 Billion | $22.87 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $2.80 Billion | $27.22 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $2.95 Billion | $28.95 Billion | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $3.02 Billion | $34.35 Billion | ▲ +175.2% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $1.23 Billion | $38.60 Billion | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $1.80 Billion | $19.37 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.34 Billion | $20.57 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $2.06 Billion | $22.50 Billion | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $2.05 Billion | $23.61 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $2.01 Billion | $12.50 Billion | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $1.01 Billion | $12.54 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $1.11 Billion | $12.33 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $949.02 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $720.42 Million | $8.09 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $931.40 Million | $7.92 Billion | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $605.08 Million | $7.66 Billion | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $384.45 Million | $7.61 Billion | ▲ +138.6% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $167.69 Million | $7.92 Billion | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $390.19 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $416.56 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | $203.71 Million | $289.74 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2003 | 1.00x | $225.58 Million | $225.27 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | $313.14 Million | $298.89 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2001 | 1.62x | $346.47 Million | $214.47 Million | ▲ +703.8% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $67.02 Million | $333.44 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1999 | 0.87x | $119.22 Million | $137.51 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 1998 | 1.11x | $163.40 Million | $146.80 Million | ▲ +118.2% |
| 1997 | 0.51x | $52.70 Million | $103.30 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1996 | 0.39x | $46.50 Million | $117.90 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 1995 | 1.00x | $75.60 Million | $75.60 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 1994 | 2.15x | $136.50 Million | $63.50 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 1993 | 1.53x | $35.60 Million | $23.30 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1992 | 1.24x | $68.30 Million | $55.10 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 1991 | 1.96x | $45.40 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 1990 | 2.41x | $39.30 Million | $16.30 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 1989 | 1.84x | $19.00 Million | $10.30 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 1985 | 6.02x | $51.20 Million | $8.50 Million | — |