Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-877.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($23.24 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Xcel Brands Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Xcel Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Xcel Brands Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Xcel Brands Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Xcel Brands Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Xcel Brands Inc. Check Xcel Brands Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-7.02 Million | $23.12 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2024 | -0.19x | $-4.72 Million | $25.36 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-6.54 Million | $23.49 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-14.18 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -485.1% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-6.56 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -249.0% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $3.19 Million | $36.80 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $3.50 Million | $44.74 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $6.59 Million | $38.18 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $4.68 Million | $37.32 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $7.92 Million | $44.95 Million | ▲ +178.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $3.29 Million | $52.04 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $5.87 Million | $65.52 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $2.38 Million | $35.55 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $2.59 Million | $42.84 Million | ▲ +970.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $273.00K | $48.34 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 2010 | 2.32x | $195.75K | $84.27K | ▲ +1161.0% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +179.8% |
| 2007 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2005 | -0.33x | $-3.05 Million | $9.25 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2004 | -0.94x | $-1.01 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-19.78K | $29.35K | ▼ -514.6% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | $-2.12K | $19.30K | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-2.11K | $10.19K | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-1.90K | $3.25K | ▲ +73.4% |
| 1999 | -2.20x | $-1.00K | $454.00 | — |