Xcel Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Xcel Brands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-877.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($23.24 Million) in one year. Check XELB cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Xcel Brands Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Xcel Brands Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Xcel Brands Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Xcel Brands Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Xcel Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Xcel Brands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Xcel Brands Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see XELB cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-7.02 Million | $23.12 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2024 | -0.19x | $-4.72 Million | $25.36 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-6.54 Million | $23.49 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-14.18 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -485.1% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-6.56 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -249.0% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $3.19 Million | $36.80 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $3.50 Million | $44.74 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $6.59 Million | $38.18 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $4.68 Million | $37.32 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $7.92 Million | $44.95 Million | ▲ +178.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $3.29 Million | $52.04 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $5.87 Million | $65.52 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $2.38 Million | $35.55 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $2.59 Million | $42.84 Million | ▲ +970.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $273.00K | $48.34 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 2010 | 2.32x | $195.75K | $84.27K | ▲ +1161.0% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +179.8% |
| 2007 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2005 | -0.33x | $-3.05 Million | $9.25 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2004 | -0.94x | $-1.01 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-19.78K | $29.35K | ▼ -514.6% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | $-2.12K | $19.30K | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-2.11K | $10.19K | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-1.90K | $3.25K | ▲ +73.4% |
| 1999 | -2.20x | $-1.00K | $454.00 | — |