Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-877.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($23.24 Million) in one year. Explore Xcel Brands Inc (XELB) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Xcel Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Xcel Brands Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore XELB current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Xcel Brands Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Xcel Brands Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Xcel Brands Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.30x | $-7.02 Million | $23.12 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2024 | -0.19x | $-4.72 Million | $25.36 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-6.54 Million | $23.49 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-14.18 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -485.1% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-6.56 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -249.0% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $3.19 Million | $36.80 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $3.50 Million | $44.74 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $6.59 Million | $38.18 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $4.68 Million | $37.32 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $7.92 Million | $44.95 Million | ▲ +178.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $3.29 Million | $52.04 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $5.87 Million | $65.52 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $2.38 Million | $35.55 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $2.59 Million | $42.84 Million | ▲ +970.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $273.00K | $48.34 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 2010 | 2.32x | $195.75K | $84.27K | ▲ +1161.0% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $1.97 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +179.8% |
| 2007 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-1.47 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2005 | -0.33x | $-3.05 Million | $9.25 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2004 | -0.94x | $-1.01 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-19.78K | $29.35K | ▼ -514.6% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | $-2.12K | $19.30K | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-2.11K | $10.19K | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-1.90K | $3.25K | ▲ +73.4% |
| 1999 | -2.20x | $-1.00K | $454.00 | — |