Agilent Technologies Inc (A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agilent Technologies Inc (A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $362.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.86 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Agilent Technologies Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Agilent Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Agilent Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Agilent Technologies Inc (A) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Agilent Technologies Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agilent Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Agilent Technologies Inc (A) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $1.56 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $1.75 Billion | $5.95 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2023 | 0.36x | $1.77 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $1.31 Billion | $5.23 Billion | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $1.49 Billion | $5.32 Billion | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $921.00 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $1.02 Billion | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $1.09 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $889.00 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $793.00 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $1.32 Billion | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +205.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $713.00 Million | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $1.15 Billion | $5.40 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $1.23 Billion | $5.35 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $1.26 Billion | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +141.1% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $712.00 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $408.00 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $756.00 Million | $4.88 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $969.00 Million | $4.32 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $634.00 Million | $3.71 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $899.00 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $670.00 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +563.4% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-144.00 Million | $3.47 Billion | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | $-498.00 Million | $3.58 Billion | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2001 | 0.65x | $1.50 Billion | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $838.00 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $461.00 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1998 | 0.38x | $751.00 Million | $1.97 Billion | — |