Agilent Technologies Inc (A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agilent Technologies Inc (A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $362.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.86 Billion) in one year. See Agilent Technologies Inc (A) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Agilent Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Agilent Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Agilent Technologies Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Agilent Technologies Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agilent Technologies Inc. Check cash flow quality index of Agilent Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $1.56 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $1.75 Billion | $5.95 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2023 | 0.36x | $1.77 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $1.31 Billion | $5.23 Billion | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $1.49 Billion | $5.32 Billion | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $921.00 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $1.02 Billion | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $1.09 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $889.00 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $793.00 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $1.32 Billion | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +205.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $713.00 Million | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $1.15 Billion | $5.40 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $1.23 Billion | $5.35 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $1.26 Billion | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +141.1% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $712.00 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $408.00 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $756.00 Million | $4.88 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $969.00 Million | $4.32 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $634.00 Million | $3.71 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $899.00 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $670.00 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +563.4% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-144.00 Million | $3.47 Billion | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | $-498.00 Million | $3.58 Billion | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2001 | 0.65x | $1.50 Billion | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $838.00 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $461.00 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1998 | 0.38x | $751.00 Million | $1.97 Billion | — |