AA Mission Acquisition Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AA Mission Acquisition Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. AA Mission Acquisition Corp. (AAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-116.39K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.16 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does AA Mission Acquisition Corp. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of AA Mission Acquisition Corp. (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of AA Mission Acquisition Corp. from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for AA Mission Acquisition Corp. across 27 annual periods. Check AAM cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
AA Mission Acquisition Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AA Mission Acquisition Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AAM cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $455.40 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $396.10 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $448.90 Million | $4.84 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $538.40 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $454.70 Million | $5.54 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $559.60 Million | $5.66 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $771.50 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $647.00 Million | $6.34 Billion | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $407.60 Million | $2.92 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $377.60 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $318.40 Million | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $223.00 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | $-175.50 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▼ -186.8% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-56.30 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $240.30 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +1269.6% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $17.30 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +111.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-163.10 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -133.4% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $367.90 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $185.70 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $280.40 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $453.20 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $496.90 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $384.20 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $232.80 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $252.20 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $310.30 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +219.8% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $81.40 Million | $1.19 Billion | — |