Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $92.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.01 Billion) in one year. See Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AGM-A market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $80.06 Million | $33.79 Billion | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $612.65 Million | $29.84 Billion | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $375.80 Million | $28.11 Billion | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $809.27 Million | $26.06 Billion | ▲ +70.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $436.41 Million | $23.91 Billion | ▲ +551.1% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-94.55 Million | $23.36 Billion | ▼ -329.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-19.70 Million | $20.91 Billion | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $200.03 Million | $17.94 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $175.01 Million | $17.08 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $208.59 Million | $14.96 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $184.35 Million | $14.99 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $155.05 Million | $13.51 Billion | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $313.99 Million | $12.79 Billion | ▲ +786.9% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $33.30 Million | $12.03 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $26.82 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▲ +105.5% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-484.20 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▼ -1106.1% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $31.11 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-19.02 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -117.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $107.68 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $116.08 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +1547.8% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-6.97 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $87.61 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $68.61 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $43.08 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $132.72 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $134.28 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $85.30 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $72.00 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +194.2% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $16.80 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $4.60 Million | $555.60 Million | ▼ -54.9% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $9.20 Million | $500.80 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $7.40 Million | $465.00 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $12.20 Million | $511.70 Million | ▲ +484.6% |
| 1992 | -0.01x | $-3.10 Million | $500.10 Million | — |