TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($563.84K) in one year. See TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $7.84 Million | $43.33 Million | ▲ +125.2% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $3.24 Million | $40.31 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.29 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $8.47 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2020 | 1.62x | $5.89 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $6.66 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2018 | -1.33x | $-13.39 Million | $10.05 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2017 | -1.09x | $-69.13 Million | $63.62 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2016 | -0.76x | $-38.64 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-25.04 Million | $64.84 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-30.28 Million | $84.84 Million | ▼ -261.4% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-8.37 Million | $84.76 Million | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $32.74 Million | $88.30 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $21.86 Million | $84.87 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $37.56 Million | $182.84 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $40.55 Million | $111.96 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | $95.23 Million | $111.88 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2007 | 0.98x | $100.47 Million | $102.44 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $92.55 Million | $92.69 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 1.23x | $91.72 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $58.00 Million | $52.32 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $41.61 Million | $40.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2002 | 1.53x | $49.92 Million | $32.62 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $33.71 Million | $27.43 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $30.15 Million | $25.86 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $33.30 Million | $27.30 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $19.30 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1997 | 0.94x | $13.04 Million | $13.81 Million | ▲ +618.9% |
| 1996 | -0.18x | $-2.20 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -119.3% |
| 1995 | 0.94x | $8.90 Million | $9.46 Million | — |