TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($563.84K) in one year. See BEBE free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp. Check BEBE operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $7.84 Million | $43.33 Million | ▲ +125.2% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $3.24 Million | $40.31 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.29 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $8.47 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2020 | 1.62x | $5.89 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $6.66 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2018 | -1.33x | $-13.39 Million | $10.05 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2017 | -1.09x | $-69.13 Million | $63.62 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2016 | -0.76x | $-38.64 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-25.04 Million | $64.84 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-30.28 Million | $84.84 Million | ▼ -261.4% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-8.37 Million | $84.76 Million | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $32.74 Million | $88.30 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $21.86 Million | $84.87 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $37.56 Million | $182.84 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $40.55 Million | $111.96 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | $95.23 Million | $111.88 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2007 | 0.98x | $100.47 Million | $102.44 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $92.55 Million | $92.69 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 1.23x | $91.72 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $58.00 Million | $52.32 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $41.61 Million | $40.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2002 | 1.53x | $49.92 Million | $32.62 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $33.71 Million | $27.43 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $30.15 Million | $25.86 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $33.30 Million | $27.30 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $19.30 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1997 | 0.94x | $13.04 Million | $13.81 Million | ▲ +618.9% |
| 1996 | -0.18x | $-2.20 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -119.3% |
| 1995 | 0.94x | $8.90 Million | $9.46 Million | — |