TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($563.84K) in one year. Check BEBE cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (1995–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp from 1995 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp across 30 annual periods. Check BEBE cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2024)
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $7.84 Million | $43.33 Million | ▲ +125.2% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $3.24 Million | $40.31 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.29 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $8.47 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2020 | 1.62x | $5.89 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $6.66 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2018 | -1.33x | $-13.39 Million | $10.05 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2017 | -1.09x | $-69.13 Million | $63.62 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2016 | -0.76x | $-38.64 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-25.04 Million | $64.84 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-30.28 Million | $84.84 Million | ▼ -261.4% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-8.37 Million | $84.76 Million | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $32.74 Million | $88.30 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $21.86 Million | $84.87 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $37.56 Million | $182.84 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $40.55 Million | $111.96 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | $95.23 Million | $111.88 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2007 | 0.98x | $100.47 Million | $102.44 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $92.55 Million | $92.69 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 1.23x | $91.72 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $58.00 Million | $52.32 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $41.61 Million | $40.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2002 | 1.53x | $49.92 Million | $32.62 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $33.71 Million | $27.43 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $30.15 Million | $25.86 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $33.30 Million | $27.30 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $19.30 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1997 | 0.94x | $13.04 Million | $13.81 Million | ▲ +618.9% |
| 1996 | -0.18x | $-2.20 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -119.3% |
| 1995 | 0.94x | $8.90 Million | $9.46 Million | — |