TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($563.84K) in one year. Explore BEBE long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $7.84 Million | $43.33 Million | ▲ +125.2% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $3.24 Million | $40.31 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.29 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $8.47 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2020 | 1.62x | $5.89 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $6.66 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2018 | -1.33x | $-13.39 Million | $10.05 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2017 | -1.09x | $-69.13 Million | $63.62 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2016 | -0.76x | $-38.64 Million | $50.84 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-25.04 Million | $64.84 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-30.28 Million | $84.84 Million | ▼ -261.4% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-8.37 Million | $84.76 Million | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $32.74 Million | $88.30 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $21.86 Million | $84.87 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $37.56 Million | $182.84 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $40.55 Million | $111.96 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | $95.23 Million | $111.88 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2007 | 0.98x | $100.47 Million | $102.44 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $92.55 Million | $92.69 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 1.23x | $91.72 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $58.00 Million | $52.32 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $41.61 Million | $40.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2002 | 1.53x | $49.92 Million | $32.62 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $33.71 Million | $27.43 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $30.15 Million | $25.86 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $33.30 Million | $27.30 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $19.30 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1997 | 0.94x | $13.04 Million | $13.81 Million | ▲ +618.9% |
| 1996 | -0.18x | $-2.20 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -119.3% |
| 1995 | 0.94x | $8.90 Million | $9.46 Million | — |