TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) — Net Asset Quality Index
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -5.9% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $532.66K minus total liabilities of $563.84K yields net assets of $-31.18K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. For live market cap and overall valuation, see BEBE stock market capitalisation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2024)
This chart shows how TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 30 annual periods from 1995 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -5.9%, representing net assets of $-31.18K against total assets of $532.66K USD. See TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (BEBE) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp (1995–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp from 1995 to 2024, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check BEBE PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51.6% | $46.17 Million | $89.50 Million | $43.33 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2023 | 54.3% | $47.85 Million | $88.17 Million | $40.31 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 55.2% | $52.46 Million | $95.06 Million | $42.60 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2021 | 51.5% | $38.49 Million | $74.71 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -36.8 pp |
| 2020 | 88.3% | $27.43 Million | $31.07 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2019 | 81.3% | $26.47 Million | $32.55 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +9.8 pp |
| 2018 | 71.5% | $25.24 Million | $35.28 Million | $10.05 Million | ▲ +92.7 pp |
| 2017 | -21.1% | $-11.10 Million | $52.52 Million | $63.62 Million | ▼ -92.8 pp |
| 2016 | 71.7% | $128.60 Million | $179.44 Million | $50.84 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 70.0% | $151.57 Million | $216.41 Million | $64.84 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2014 | 68.6% | $185.52 Million | $270.36 Million | $84.84 Million | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2013 | 75.4% | $259.50 Million | $344.26 Million | $84.76 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2012 | 80.4% | $362.12 Million | $450.42 Million | $88.30 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 80.8% | $356.25 Million | $441.12 Million | $84.87 Million | ▲ +13.9 pp |
| 2010 | 66.9% | $369.06 Million | $551.89 Million | $182.84 Million | ▼ -13.5 pp |
| 2009 | 80.4% | $459.50 Million | $571.46 Million | $111.96 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2008 | 81.3% | $485.88 Million | $597.76 Million | $111.88 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2007 | 83.1% | $504.59 Million | $607.03 Million | $102.44 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2006 | 81.5% | $408.22 Million | $500.91 Million | $92.69 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 81.8% | $333.24 Million | $407.55 Million | $74.30 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2004 | 82.4% | $244.42 Million | $296.74 Million | $52.32 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2003 | 83.2% | $201.34 Million | $241.98 Million | $40.63 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2002 | 84.7% | $180.54 Million | $213.16 Million | $32.62 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2001 | 84.3% | $147.30 Million | $174.73 Million | $27.43 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2000 | 81.2% | $111.80 Million | $137.66 Million | $25.86 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 1999 | 74.6% | $80.10 Million | $107.40 Million | $27.30 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 1998 | 70.6% | $45.30 Million | $64.20 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 1997 | 52.5% | $15.29 Million | $29.11 Million | $13.81 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 1996 | 45.1% | $9.91 Million | $22.00 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 1995 | 50.8% | $9.78 Million | $19.24 Million | $9.46 Million | — |