Bimergen Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bimergen Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.84 Million) in one year. Check BESS cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bimergen Energy Corporation (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bimergen Energy Corporation from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bimergen Energy Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Bimergen Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Bimergen Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bimergen Energy Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 112088.88x | $878.44 Billion | $7.84 Million | ▲ +56295097.5% |
| 2024 | -0.20x | $-349.83K | $1.76 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2023 | -13.00x | $-457.81K | $35.23K | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2022 | -69.26x | $-789.34K | $11.40K | ▼ -2246.4% |
| 2021 | 3.23x | $35.84K | $11.11K | ▲ +285.0% |
| 2020 | 0.84x | $446.97K | $533.29K | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $635.91K | $1.11 Million | ▲ +906.6% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-123.16K | $1.74 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | $-149.81K | $1.66 Million | ▼ -174.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $202.62K | $1.66 Million | ▲ +152.0% |
| 2015 | -0.24x | $-429.30K | $1.82 Million | ▼ -728.3% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $57.28K | $1.53 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $184.15K | $1.74 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2012 | -0.25x | $-566.23K | $2.24 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2011 | -0.25x | $-642.53K | $2.57 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2010 | -0.67x | $-1.04 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | $-236.51K | $811.77K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-100.20K | $668.35K | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-139.15K | $808.25K | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-64.77K | $783.54K | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2005 | -0.12x | $-103.20K | $884.19K | ▲ +58.6% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-109.44K | $387.78K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-84.35K | $557.38K | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2002 | -0.39x | $-232.77K | $592.62K | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2001 | -0.34x | $-149.96K | $442.47K | ▼ -149.2% |
| 2000 | 0.69x | $223.34K | $324.44K | ▲ +168.8% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-200.00K | $200.00K | — |