Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.84 Million) in one year. See Bimergen Energy Corporation free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bimergen Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bimergen Energy Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore Bimergen Energy Corporation equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bimergen Energy Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bimergen Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 112088.88x | $878.44 Billion | $7.84 Million | ▲ +56295097.5% |
| 2024 | -0.20x | $-349.83K | $1.76 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2023 | -13.00x | $-457.81K | $35.23K | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2022 | -69.26x | $-789.34K | $11.40K | ▼ -2246.4% |
| 2021 | 3.23x | $35.84K | $11.11K | ▲ +285.0% |
| 2020 | 0.84x | $446.97K | $533.29K | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $635.91K | $1.11 Million | ▲ +906.6% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-123.16K | $1.74 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | $-149.81K | $1.66 Million | ▼ -174.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $202.62K | $1.66 Million | ▲ +152.0% |
| 2015 | -0.24x | $-429.30K | $1.82 Million | ▼ -728.3% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $57.28K | $1.53 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $184.15K | $1.74 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2012 | -0.25x | $-566.23K | $2.24 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2011 | -0.25x | $-642.53K | $2.57 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2010 | -0.67x | $-1.04 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | $-236.51K | $811.77K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-100.20K | $668.35K | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-139.15K | $808.25K | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-64.77K | $783.54K | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2005 | -0.12x | $-103.20K | $884.19K | ▲ +58.6% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-109.44K | $387.78K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-84.35K | $557.38K | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2002 | -0.39x | $-232.77K | $592.62K | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2001 | -0.34x | $-149.96K | $442.47K | ▼ -149.2% |
| 2000 | 0.69x | $223.34K | $324.44K | ▲ +168.8% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-200.00K | $200.00K | — |