Bimergen Energy Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bimergen Energy Corporation working capital to net assets ratio. Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -23.4% as of December 2025. Working capital of $-4.54 Million (current assets of $3.30 Million minus current liabilities of $7.84 Million) is measured against net assets of $19.36 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible net worth ratio of Bimergen Energy Corporation to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Bimergen Energy Corporation (1999–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Bimergen Energy Corporation from 1999 to 2025. This chart shows how Bimergen Energy Corporation's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at -23.4%, reflecting working capital of $-4.54 Million against net assets of $19.36 Million USD. See BESS defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Bimergen Energy Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Bimergen Energy Corporation working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bimergen Energy Corporation from 1999 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Bimergen Energy Corporation.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -23.4% | $-4.54 Million | $19.36 Million | $3.30 Million | $7.84 Million | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2024 | -3.4% | $-728.11K | $21.49 Million | $1.03 Million | $1.76 Million | ▼ -103.4 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $128.19K | $128.19K | $163.42K | $35.23K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $199.33K | $199.33K | $210.72K | $11.40K | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2021 | 96.5% | $965.84K | $1.00 Million | $976.95K | $11.11K | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2020 | 104.4% | $-259.39K | $-248.43K | $273.90K | $533.29K | ▲ +1141.9 pp |
| 2019 | -1037.5% | $-507.99K | $48.96K | $603.25K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -1006.8 pp |
| 2018 | -30.7% | $-509.27K | $1.66 Million | $1.23 Million | $1.74 Million | ▼ -18.2 pp |
| 2017 | -12.5% | $-291.01K | $2.33 Million | $1.37 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2016 | 6.9% | $187.09K | $2.71 Million | $1.84 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2015 | 30.6% | $1.08 Million | $3.53 Million | $1.71 Million | $629.86K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2014 | 33.3% | $1.52 Million | $4.56 Million | $2.00 Million | $480.00K | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2013 | 48.8% | $2.73 Million | $5.59 Million | $3.47 Million | $740.67K | ▼ -13.7 pp |
| 2012 | 62.5% | $3.63 Million | $5.81 Million | $4.54 Million | $907.95K | ▲ +41.8 pp |
| 2011 | 20.7% | $775.95K | $3.75 Million | $3.03 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +10.1 pp |
| 2010 | 10.6% | $188.06K | $1.77 Million | $1.61 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -89.4 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-270.48K | $-270.48K | $541.29K | $811.77K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $-777.76K | $-777.76K | $30.49K | $808.25K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $-778.59K | $-778.59K | $4.95K | $783.54K | ▼ -24.4 pp |
| 2005 | 124.4% | $-871.95K | $-701.15K | $12.24K | $884.19K | ▲ +24.4 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $-356.36K | $-356.36K | $31.42K | $387.78K | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2002 | 103.3% | $-568.81K | $-550.80K | $23.81K | $592.62K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $-438.75K | $-438.75K | $3.72K | $442.47K | ▲ +110.5 pp |
| 1999 | -10.5% | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | $100.00K | $300.00K | — |