Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -23.4% as of December 2025. Working capital of $-4.54 Million (current assets of $3.30 Million minus current liabilities of $7.84 Million) is measured against net assets of $19.36 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See BESS defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Bimergen Energy Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets (1999–2025)
This chart shows how Bimergen Energy Corporation's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at -23.4%, reflecting working capital of $-4.54 Million against net assets of $19.36 Million USD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Bimergen Energy Corporation (BESS) total assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Bimergen Energy Corporation (1999–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bimergen Energy Corporation from 1999 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Read BESS liabilities breakdown for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -23.4% | $-4.54 Million | $19.36 Million | $3.30 Million | $7.84 Million | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2024 | -3.4% | $-728.11K | $21.49 Million | $1.03 Million | $1.76 Million | ▼ -103.4 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $128.19K | $128.19K | $163.42K | $35.23K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $199.33K | $199.33K | $210.72K | $11.40K | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2021 | 96.5% | $965.84K | $1.00 Million | $976.95K | $11.11K | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2020 | 104.4% | $-259.39K | $-248.43K | $273.90K | $533.29K | ▲ +1141.9 pp |
| 2019 | -1037.5% | $-507.99K | $48.96K | $603.25K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -1006.8 pp |
| 2018 | -30.7% | $-509.27K | $1.66 Million | $1.23 Million | $1.74 Million | ▼ -18.2 pp |
| 2017 | -12.5% | $-291.01K | $2.33 Million | $1.37 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2016 | 6.9% | $187.09K | $2.71 Million | $1.84 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2015 | 30.6% | $1.08 Million | $3.53 Million | $1.71 Million | $629.86K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2014 | 33.3% | $1.52 Million | $4.56 Million | $2.00 Million | $480.00K | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2013 | 48.8% | $2.73 Million | $5.59 Million | $3.47 Million | $740.67K | ▼ -13.7 pp |
| 2012 | 62.5% | $3.63 Million | $5.81 Million | $4.54 Million | $907.95K | ▲ +41.8 pp |
| 2011 | 20.7% | $775.95K | $3.75 Million | $3.03 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +10.1 pp |
| 2010 | 10.6% | $188.06K | $1.77 Million | $1.61 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -89.4 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-270.48K | $-270.48K | $541.29K | $811.77K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $-777.76K | $-777.76K | $30.49K | $808.25K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $-778.59K | $-778.59K | $4.95K | $783.54K | ▼ -24.4 pp |
| 2005 | 124.4% | $-871.95K | $-701.15K | $12.24K | $884.19K | ▲ +24.4 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $-356.36K | $-356.36K | $31.42K | $387.78K | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2002 | 103.3% | $-568.81K | $-550.80K | $23.81K | $592.62K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $-438.75K | $-438.75K | $3.72K | $442.47K | ▲ +110.5 pp |
| 1999 | -10.5% | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | $100.00K | $300.00K | — |