Saul Centers Inc (BFS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Saul Centers Inc (BFS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.68 Billion) in one year. See Saul Centers Inc (BFS) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Saul Centers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Saul Centers Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Saul Centers Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Saul Centers Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Saul Centers Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Saul Centers Inc (BFS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $99.80 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $121.22 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $117.73 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $121.15 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $118.38 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $78.38 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $115.38 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $110.34 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $103.45 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $89.09 Million | $969.78 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $88.90 Million | $950.42 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $86.57 Million | $927.73 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $73.53 Million | $883.55 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $78.42 Million | $900.02 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $55.67 Million | $899.36 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $62.89 Million | $774.08 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $69.02 Million | $699.51 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $73.10 Million | $625.99 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $71.20 Million | $573.92 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $62.17 Million | $562.66 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $58.40 Million | $516.99 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $50.71 Million | $482.43 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $36.37 Million | $378.97 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $37.50 Million | $401.95 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $31.83 Million | $370.53 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $33.31 Million | $365.61 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $31.64 Million | $331.52 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $29.69 Million | $308.32 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $28.94 Million | $299.00 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $30.67 Million | $289.86 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $26.10 Million | $286.10 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $24.50 Million | $263.60 Million | ▲ +442.5% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $3.50 Million | $204.30 Million | — |