Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-273.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.76 Billion) in one year. See Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Beazer Homes USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Beazer Homes USA Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Beazer Homes USA Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Beazer Homes USA Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beazer Homes USA Inc. Check Beazer Homes USA Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $31.98 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-137.54 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $178.06 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $81.07 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +164.2% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $31.66 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $289.10 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $113.64 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +292.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $30.29 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $95.91 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $163.03 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +329.4% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-81.05 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-160.47 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-174.64 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-20.84 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-178.94 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -317.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $69.69 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $93.83 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $315.57 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $509.37 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +283.4% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | $-304.46 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-84.26 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-73.72 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-41.05 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -161.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $59.46 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-29.41 Million | $644.09 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-18.73 Million | $428.34 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $34.30 Million | $359.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $27.10 Million | $326.40 Million | ▲ +189.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-20.50 Million | $220.30 Million | ▼ -16654.5% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $177.90 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $6.20 Million | $180.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $5.10 Million | $164.50 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-25.70 Million | $149.70 Million | — |