Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.59 Billion) in one year. Explore BZH long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Beazer Homes USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Beazer Homes USA Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Beazer Homes USA Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Beazer Homes USA Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beazer Homes USA Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Beazer Homes USA Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $31.98 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-137.54 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $178.06 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $81.07 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +164.2% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $31.66 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $289.10 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $113.64 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +292.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $30.29 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $95.91 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $163.03 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +329.4% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-81.05 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-160.47 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-174.64 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-20.84 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-178.94 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -317.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $69.69 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $93.83 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $315.57 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $509.37 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +283.4% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | $-304.46 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-84.26 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-73.72 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-41.05 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -161.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $59.46 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-29.41 Million | $644.09 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-18.73 Million | $428.34 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $34.30 Million | $359.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $27.10 Million | $326.40 Million | ▲ +189.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-20.50 Million | $220.30 Million | ▼ -16654.5% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $177.90 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $6.20 Million | $180.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $5.10 Million | $164.50 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-25.70 Million | $149.70 Million | — |