Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.59 Billion) in one year. See BZH cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Beazer Homes USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Beazer Homes USA Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Beazer Homes USA Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Beazer Homes USA Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beazer Homes USA Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Beazer Homes USA Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $31.98 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-137.54 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $178.06 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $81.07 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +164.2% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $31.66 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $289.10 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $113.64 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +292.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $30.29 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $95.91 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $163.03 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +329.4% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-81.05 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-160.47 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-174.64 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-20.84 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-178.94 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -317.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $69.69 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $93.83 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $315.57 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $509.37 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +283.4% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | $-304.46 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-84.26 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-73.72 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-41.05 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -161.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $59.46 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-29.41 Million | $644.09 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-18.73 Million | $428.34 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $34.30 Million | $359.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $27.10 Million | $326.40 Million | ▲ +189.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-20.50 Million | $220.30 Million | ▼ -16654.5% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $177.90 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $6.20 Million | $180.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $5.10 Million | $164.50 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-25.70 Million | $149.70 Million | — |