Beazer Homes USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beazer Homes USA Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-273.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.76 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Beazer Homes USA Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Beazer Homes USA Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Beazer Homes USA Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Beazer Homes USA Inc across 33 annual periods. Check Beazer Homes USA Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Beazer Homes USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Beazer Homes USA Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beazer Homes USA Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Beazer Homes USA Inc (BZH) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $31.98 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-137.54 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $178.06 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $81.07 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +164.2% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $31.66 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $289.10 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $113.64 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +292.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $30.29 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $95.91 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $163.03 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +329.4% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-81.05 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-160.47 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-174.64 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-20.84 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-178.94 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -317.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $69.69 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $93.83 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $315.57 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $509.37 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +283.4% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | $-304.46 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-84.26 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-73.72 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-41.05 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -161.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $59.46 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-29.41 Million | $644.09 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-18.73 Million | $428.34 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $34.30 Million | $359.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $27.10 Million | $326.40 Million | ▲ +189.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-20.50 Million | $220.30 Million | ▼ -16654.5% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $177.90 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $6.20 Million | $180.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $5.10 Million | $164.50 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-25.70 Million | $149.70 Million | — |