Chemed Corp (CHE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chemed Corp (CHE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $83.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($546.94 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Chemed Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chemed Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chemed Corp across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Chemed Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chemed Corp (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chemed Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Chemed Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.76x | $417.50 Million | $549.58 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2023 | 0.59x | $330.30 Million | $560.22 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | $309.89 Million | $643.30 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $308.60 Million | $719.45 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.92x | $489.29 Million | $533.71 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2019 | 0.56x | $301.25 Million | $541.71 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2018 | 0.75x | $287.14 Million | $384.19 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $162.50 Million | $379.67 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $135.39 Million | $355.96 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | $171.50 Million | $339.07 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $110.28 Million | $408.58 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | $150.85 Million | $444.81 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $131.77 Million | $406.33 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $174.34 Million | $382.22 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $86.01 Million | $368.11 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $160.83 Million | $342.31 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $112.08 Million | $389.33 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $99.58 Million | $407.96 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2006 | 0.27x | $98.59 Million | $371.93 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $80.01 Million | $450.91 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $94.16 Million | $493.47 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $22.59 Million | $136.38 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $29.52 Million | $135.65 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $34.36 Million | $173.99 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $51.84 Million | $192.97 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $27.50 Million | $209.30 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $20.80 Million | $206.30 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $33.40 Million | $220.70 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $35.80 Million | $330.70 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $18.80 Million | $282.20 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $23.10 Million | $283.00 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $17.70 Million | $261.10 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 1992 | 0.07x | $18.10 Million | $242.70 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 1991 | 0.10x | $20.20 Million | $198.90 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 1990 | 0.21x | $40.00 Million | $191.20 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 1989 | 0.25x | $47.80 Million | $190.20 Million | — |