Core Laboratories NV (CLB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core Laboratories NV (CLB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($312.58 Million) in one year. Explore CLB strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Core Laboratories NV Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Core Laboratories NV across 31 annual periods. Also explore how large is Core Laboratories NV's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Core Laboratories NV (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core Laboratories NV. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CLB market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $37.18 Million | $317.19 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $56.39 Million | $332.67 Million | ▲ +143.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $24.79 Million | $356.59 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $24.96 Million | $389.40 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $36.58 Million | $419.85 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $57.87 Million | $493.01 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $89.53 Million | $592.53 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $111.83 Million | $487.93 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $124.27 Million | $436.08 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $131.89 Million | $417.75 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $219.10 Million | $648.96 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $303.45 Million | $581.66 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $298.14 Million | $491.62 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2012 | 0.53x | $237.20 Million | $448.60 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2011 | 0.48x | $204.13 Million | $423.48 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2010 | 0.60x | $205.83 Million | $343.70 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $181.87 Million | $376.41 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $155.21 Million | $377.34 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $125.69 Million | $441.16 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | $120.31 Million | $427.93 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $74.78 Million | $179.28 Million | ▲ +51.9% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $54.20 Million | $197.43 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | $60.88 Million | $199.92 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $40.98 Million | $162.66 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $28.32 Million | $163.08 Million | ▲ +274.8% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $7.27 Million | $156.86 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $4.50 Million | $150.90 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $6.60 Million | $150.50 Million | ▲ +383.2% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-1.90 Million | $122.70 Million | ▼ -105.6% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $8.80 Million | $32.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $7.70 Million | $28.10 Million | — |