Core Laboratories NV (CLB) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Core Laboratories NV (CLB) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.5% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($6.89 Million) from net assets ($275.14 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Core Laboratories NV equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Core Laboratories NV Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Core Laboratories NV's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 97.5%, reflecting net assets of $275.14 Million with intangible assets of $6.89 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CLB company net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Core Laboratories NV (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Core Laboratories NV from 1995 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore Core Laboratories NV (CLB) reinvestment ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21.1% | $279.76 Million | $220.79 Million | $596.95 Million | ▼ -76.4 pp |
| 2024 | 97.5% | $257.74 Million | $6.40 Million | $590.41 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2023 | 97.0% | $229.81 Million | $6.93 Million | $586.39 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 96.0% | $188.95 Million | $7.48 Million | $578.35 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2021 | 94.9% | $161.00 Million | $8.14 Million | $580.85 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2020 | 88.6% | $75.57 Million | $8.58 Million | $568.58 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2019 | 90.4% | $182.14 Million | $17.45 Million | $774.67 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2018 | 91.9% | $160.90 Million | $13.05 Million | $648.83 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | $148.73 Million | $9.40 Million | $584.81 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 93.6% | $155.30 Million | $9.94 Million | $573.05 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2014 | 88.7% | $93.99 Million | $10.64 Million | $675.65 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2013 | 93.5% | $169.39 Million | $10.95 Million | $661.01 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2012 | 95.4% | $187.91 Million | $8.72 Million | $636.52 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 95.5% | $181.66 Million | $8.22 Million | $605.14 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2010 | 97.0% | $292.34 Million | $8.66 Million | $636.04 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 97.7% | $281.76 Million | $6.52 Million | $658.17 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 95.6% | $160.31 Million | $6.99 Million | $537.65 Million | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2007 | 88.9% | $63.63 Million | $7.04 Million | $504.79 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2006 | 91.0% | $73.28 Million | $6.60 Million | $501.21 Million | ▲ +55.7 pp |
| 2005 | 35.3% | $215.32 Million | $139.34 Million | $394.60 Million | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2004 | 27.0% | $191.37 Million | $139.67 Million | $388.80 Million | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2003 | 37.6% | $221.48 Million | $138.28 Million | $421.40 Million | ▼ -7.4 pp |
| 2002 | 44.9% | $258.49 Million | $142.36 Million | $421.15 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2001 | 45.3% | $276.42 Million | $151.26 Million | $439.50 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2000 | 41.7% | $253.75 Million | $147.92 Million | $410.60 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 1999 | 28.5% | $210.20 Million | $150.30 Million | $361.10 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 1998 | 24.5% | $198.10 Million | $149.50 Million | $348.60 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 1997 | 28.2% | $115.30 Million | $82.80 Million | $238.00 Million | ▼ -54.2 pp |
| 1996 | 82.4% | $47.60 Million | $8.40 Million | $79.70 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 1995 | 77.2% | $37.20 Million | $8.50 Million | $65.30 Million | — |