Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.70x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.04 Billion could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($1.49 Billion) in one year. See DECK FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Deckers Outdoor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Deckers Outdoor Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore DECK net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Deckers Outdoor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.93x | $1.04 Billion | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2024 | 1.00x | $1.03 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2023 | 0.68x | $537.42 Million | $790.47 Million | ▲ +213.0% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $172.35 Million | $793.42 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2021 | 0.82x | $596.22 Million | $723.48 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | $286.33 Million | $625.00 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $359.50 Million | $382.08 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $327.36 Million | $323.60 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2017 | 0.84x | $199.33 Million | $237.53 Million | ▲ +107.2% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $125.81 Million | $310.60 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2015 | 0.73x | $169.65 Million | $232.92 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2014 | 1.49x | $262.12 Million | $175.35 Million | ▲ +200.3% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $163.91 Million | $329.26 Million | ▲ +404.2% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $30.09 Million | $304.77 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2011 | 0.91x | $139.92 Million | $153.32 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2010 | 1.73x | $185.47 Million | $107.14 Million | ▲ +221.9% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $53.28 Million | $99.06 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2008 | 0.86x | $61.05 Million | $71.39 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $48.50 Million | $39.56 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2006 | 0.96x | $29.61 Million | $30.84 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $12.42 Million | $33.82 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | $11.05 Million | $50.50 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $7.44 Million | $57.19 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $11.05 Million | $19.35 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2001 | 1.08x | $14.65 Million | $13.62 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2000 | 1.09x | $18.20 Million | $16.70 Million | ▲ +446.2% |
| 1999 | -0.31x | $-10.20 Million | $32.40 Million | ▼ -162.3% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $8.90 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | $8.90 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $4.90 Million | $21.40 Million | ▲ +112.3% |
| 1995 | -1.86x | $-10.80 Million | $5.80 Million | ▼ -137.0% |
| 1994 | -0.79x | $-4.40 Million | $5.60 Million | — |