Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.70x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.04 Billion could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($1.49 Billion) in one year. Check Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Deckers Outdoor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Deckers Outdoor Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore DECK asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Deckers Outdoor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DECK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.93x | $1.04 Billion | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2024 | 1.00x | $1.03 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2023 | 0.68x | $537.42 Million | $790.47 Million | ▲ +213.0% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $172.35 Million | $793.42 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2021 | 0.82x | $596.22 Million | $723.48 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | $286.33 Million | $625.00 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $359.50 Million | $382.08 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $327.36 Million | $323.60 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2017 | 0.84x | $199.33 Million | $237.53 Million | ▲ +107.2% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $125.81 Million | $310.60 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2015 | 0.73x | $169.65 Million | $232.92 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2014 | 1.49x | $262.12 Million | $175.35 Million | ▲ +200.3% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $163.91 Million | $329.26 Million | ▲ +404.2% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $30.09 Million | $304.77 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2011 | 0.91x | $139.92 Million | $153.32 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2010 | 1.73x | $185.47 Million | $107.14 Million | ▲ +221.9% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $53.28 Million | $99.06 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2008 | 0.86x | $61.05 Million | $71.39 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $48.50 Million | $39.56 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2006 | 0.96x | $29.61 Million | $30.84 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $12.42 Million | $33.82 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | $11.05 Million | $50.50 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $7.44 Million | $57.19 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $11.05 Million | $19.35 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2001 | 1.08x | $14.65 Million | $13.62 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2000 | 1.09x | $18.20 Million | $16.70 Million | ▲ +446.2% |
| 1999 | -0.31x | $-10.20 Million | $32.40 Million | ▼ -162.3% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $8.90 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | $8.90 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $4.90 Million | $21.40 Million | ▲ +112.3% |
| 1995 | -1.86x | $-10.80 Million | $5.80 Million | ▼ -137.0% |
| 1994 | -0.79x | $-4.40 Million | $5.60 Million | — |