Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2019: 0.00x

Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of $0.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.78 Billion) in one year. See Phoenix New Media Limited free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$0.00
USD

Total Liabilities

$1.78 Billion
USD

Data as of

Dec 2019
Most recent filing

Phoenix New Media Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Phoenix New Media Limited across 15 annual periods. Also explore FENG year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Phoenix New Media Limited (2010–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Phoenix New Media Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Phoenix New Media Limited market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.07x $-44.30 Million $598.52 Million ▲ +27.6%
2023 -0.10x $-60.83 Million $595.12 Million ▲ +75.0%
2022 -0.41x $-312.41 Million $765.60 Million ▼ -190.5%
2021 -0.14x $-142.82 Million $1.02 Billion ▼ -51.0%
2020 -0.09x $-103.11 Million $1.11 Billion ▲ +49.9%
2019 -0.19x $-330.31 Million $1.78 Billion ▼ -199.5%
2018 -0.06x $-76.82 Million $1.24 Billion ▼ -139.3%
2017 0.16x $172.98 Million $1.10 Billion ▼ -22.2%
2016 0.20x $203.69 Million $1.01 Billion ▼ -30.1%
2015 0.29x $220.81 Million $762.52 Million ▼ -35.4%
2014 0.45x $273.47 Million $610.17 Million ▼ -37.9%
2013 0.72x $347.80 Million $481.73 Million ▲ +107.5%
2012 0.35x $109.58 Million $314.92 Million ▲ +38.7%
2011 0.25x $64.64 Million $257.71 Million ▼ -55.5%
2010 0.56x $85.68 Million $152.04 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.