Greif Bros Corporation (GEF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Greif Bros Corporation (GEF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $116.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.52 Billion) in one year. See GEF free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Greif Bros Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Greif Bros Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Greif Bros Corporation equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Greif Bros Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Greif Bros Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GEF market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $58.60 Million | $2.72 Billion | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $356.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $649.50 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $657.50 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $396.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $454.70 Million | $4.29 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $389.50 Million | $4.21 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $253.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $305.00 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $301.00 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $206.30 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $261.80 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $250.30 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $473.50 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +205.0% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $172.30 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $178.11 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $266.52 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $139.84 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $388.24 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $229.11 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $188.38 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $236.24 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +152.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $99.30 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $147.03 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $98.86 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $117.23 Million | $396.82 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $71.77 Million | $423.00 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $76.90 Million | $412.50 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $40.10 Million | $150.00 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 1996 | 0.73x | $81.90 Million | $111.70 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $85.80 Million | $95.20 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $48.05 Million | $92.14 Million | — |