Global Industrial Co (GIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Global Industrial Co (GIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($261.20 Million) in one year. See GIC financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Global Industrial Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Global Industrial Co across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Global Industrial Co generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Global Industrial Co (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Global Industrial Co. Check GIC cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $77.70 Million | $267.60 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $50.70 Million | $239.60 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $112.00 Million | $258.20 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $50.20 Million | $244.80 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $49.80 Million | $251.40 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $68.20 Million | $268.10 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $68.40 Million | $221.40 Million | ▲ +643.5% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-22.30 Million | $392.30 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $45.60 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-57.40 Million | $351.70 Million | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $86.50 Million | $456.50 Million | ▲ +101531.4% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $535.30 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $46.80 Million | $536.20 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $75.00 Million | $530.10 Million | ▲ +238.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $18.21 Million | $435.37 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $64.88 Million | $484.83 Million | ▲ +1169.5% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.77 Million | $452.22 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $82.42 Million | $369.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $93.08 Million | $338.04 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $34.33 Million | $294.67 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $34.98 Million | $271.70 Million | ▲ +162.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $12.62 Million | $257.78 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-6.95 Million | $233.08 Million | ▼ -244.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $4.87 Million | $235.99 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $95.61 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +1497.1% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $8.47 Million | $282.35 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $20.50 Million | $241.70 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $37.80 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $33.10 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $19.60 Million | $102.90 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $93.50 Million | — |