Global Industrial Co (GIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Global Industrial Co (GIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($261.20 Million) in one year. Check GIC cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Global Industrial Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Global Industrial Co across 31 annual periods. Also explore GIC total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Global Industrial Co (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Global Industrial Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Global Industrial Co market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $77.70 Million | $267.60 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $50.70 Million | $239.60 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $112.00 Million | $258.20 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $50.20 Million | $244.80 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $49.80 Million | $251.40 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $68.20 Million | $268.10 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $68.40 Million | $221.40 Million | ▲ +643.5% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-22.30 Million | $392.30 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $45.60 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-57.40 Million | $351.70 Million | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $86.50 Million | $456.50 Million | ▲ +101531.4% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $535.30 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $46.80 Million | $536.20 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $75.00 Million | $530.10 Million | ▲ +238.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $18.21 Million | $435.37 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $64.88 Million | $484.83 Million | ▲ +1169.5% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.77 Million | $452.22 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $82.42 Million | $369.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $93.08 Million | $338.04 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $34.33 Million | $294.67 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $34.98 Million | $271.70 Million | ▲ +162.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $12.62 Million | $257.78 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-6.95 Million | $233.08 Million | ▼ -244.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $4.87 Million | $235.99 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $95.61 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +1497.1% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $8.47 Million | $282.35 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $20.50 Million | $241.70 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $37.80 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $33.10 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $19.60 Million | $102.90 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $93.50 Million | — |