Global Industrial Co (GIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Global Industrial Co (GIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($261.20 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Global Industrial Co to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Global Industrial Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Global Industrial Co across 31 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Global Industrial Co growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Global Industrial Co (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Global Industrial Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Global Industrial Co (GIC) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $77.70 Million | $267.60 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $50.70 Million | $239.60 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $112.00 Million | $258.20 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $50.20 Million | $244.80 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $49.80 Million | $251.40 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $68.20 Million | $268.10 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $68.40 Million | $221.40 Million | ▲ +643.5% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-22.30 Million | $392.30 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $45.60 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-57.40 Million | $351.70 Million | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $86.50 Million | $456.50 Million | ▲ +101531.4% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $535.30 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $46.80 Million | $536.20 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $75.00 Million | $530.10 Million | ▲ +238.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $18.21 Million | $435.37 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $64.88 Million | $484.83 Million | ▲ +1169.5% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.77 Million | $452.22 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $82.42 Million | $369.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $93.08 Million | $338.04 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $34.33 Million | $294.67 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $34.98 Million | $271.70 Million | ▲ +162.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $12.62 Million | $257.78 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-6.95 Million | $233.08 Million | ▼ -244.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $4.87 Million | $235.99 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $95.61 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +1497.1% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $8.47 Million | $282.35 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $20.50 Million | $241.70 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $37.80 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $33.10 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $19.60 Million | $102.90 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $93.50 Million | — |