Global Industrial Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Global Industrial Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Global Industrial Co (GIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($285.70 Million) in one year. Check Global Industrial Co cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Global Industrial Co (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Global Industrial Co from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Global Industrial Co across 31 annual periods. Check Global Industrial Co cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Global Industrial Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Global Industrial Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Global Industrial Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GIC cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $77.70 Million | $267.60 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $50.70 Million | $239.60 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $112.00 Million | $258.20 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $50.20 Million | $244.80 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $49.80 Million | $251.40 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $68.20 Million | $268.10 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $68.40 Million | $221.40 Million | ▲ +643.5% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-22.30 Million | $392.30 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $45.60 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +182.3% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-57.40 Million | $351.70 Million | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $86.50 Million | $456.50 Million | ▲ +101531.4% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $535.30 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $46.80 Million | $536.20 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $75.00 Million | $530.10 Million | ▲ +238.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $18.21 Million | $435.37 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $64.88 Million | $484.83 Million | ▲ +1169.5% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.77 Million | $452.22 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $82.42 Million | $369.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $93.08 Million | $338.04 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $34.33 Million | $294.67 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $34.98 Million | $271.70 Million | ▲ +162.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $12.62 Million | $257.78 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-6.95 Million | $233.08 Million | ▼ -244.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $4.87 Million | $235.99 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $95.61 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +1497.1% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $8.47 Million | $282.35 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $20.50 Million | $241.70 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $37.80 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $33.10 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $19.60 Million | $102.90 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $93.50 Million | — |