Getty Realty Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Getty Realty Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Getty Realty Corporation (GTY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.68 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.17 Billion) in one year. Check GTY cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Getty Realty Corporation (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Getty Realty Corporation from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Getty Realty Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check Getty Realty Corporation (GTY) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Getty Realty Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Getty Realty Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Getty Realty Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Getty Realty Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $127.45 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $130.50 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $105.30 Million | $866.75 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $93.09 Million | $802.45 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $86.82 Million | $721.84 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $82.83 Million | $689.91 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $76.77 Million | $622.34 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $63.35 Million | $578.01 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $56.74 Million | $519.06 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $36.87 Million | $446.39 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $49.69 Million | $492.57 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $29.24 Million | $280.48 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $43.68 Million | $267.31 Million | ▲ +175.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $15.88 Million | $267.83 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $61.23 Million | $262.92 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $56.92 Million | $112.21 Million | ▲ +117.5% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $52.53 Million | $225.20 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | $47.58 Million | $181.92 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $44.52 Million | $184.73 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $45.85 Million | $83.71 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.63x | $45.56 Million | $72.10 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2004 | 0.64x | $41.92 Million | $65.22 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $38.44 Million | $43.98 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.74x | $36.34 Million | $49.06 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2001 | 0.72x | $36.23 Million | $50.41 Million | ▲ +430.5% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $17.29 Million | $127.63 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $15.74 Million | $118.94 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $16.06 Million | $123.05 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $11.92 Million | $129.95 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | $32.20 Million | $184.00 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $16.70 Million | $150.90 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $41.30 Million | $180.50 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $38.10 Million | $200.20 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 1992 | 0.27x | $57.80 Million | $211.90 Million | ▲ +744.9% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-9.80 Million | $231.70 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $24.40 Million | $237.10 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 1989 | 0.25x | $46.40 Million | $188.90 Million | — |