Tekla Healthcare Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tekla Healthcare Investors cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 6.25x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.72 Million could theoretically repay 6% of its total liabilities ($1.40 Million) in one year. Check HQH operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tekla Healthcare Investors (1996–2014)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tekla Healthcare Investors from 1996 to 2014. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tekla Healthcare Investors across 18 annual periods. Check HQH cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tekla Healthcare Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2014)
Tekla Healthcare Investors cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2014. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tekla Healthcare Investors. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tekla Healthcare Investors cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -124.42x | $-141.08 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -649.7% |
| 2013 | 22.63x | $20.37 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2012 | 43.97x | $26.38 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2011 | 6.89x | $18.61 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +561.0% |
| 2010 | 1.04x | $10.74 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +456.7% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | $-2.66 Million | $9.10 Million | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2008 | -1.45x | $-6.52 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2007 | -7.34x | $-5.14 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2006 | -2.28x | $-4.11 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2005 | -3.80x | $-5.32 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2004 | -2.12x | $-4.87 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -199.8% |
| 2003 | -0.71x | $-3.32 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2002 | -7.54x | $-3.77 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -207.8% |
| 2001 | -2.45x | $-2.45 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2000 | -3.24x | $-2.59 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 1998 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -88.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57x | $-1.67 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1996 | -2.89x | $-2.02 Million | $700.00K | — |