Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 6.25x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.72 Million could theoretically repay 6% of its total liabilities ($1.40 Million) in one year. See HQH free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tekla Healthcare Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2014)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tekla Healthcare Investors across 18 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Tekla Healthcare Investors to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tekla Healthcare Investors (1996–2014)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tekla Healthcare Investors. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tekla Healthcare Investors stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -124.42x | $-141.08 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -649.7% |
| 2013 | 22.63x | $20.37 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2012 | 43.97x | $26.38 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2011 | 6.89x | $18.61 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +561.0% |
| 2010 | 1.04x | $10.74 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +456.7% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | $-2.66 Million | $9.10 Million | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2008 | -1.45x | $-6.52 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2007 | -7.34x | $-5.14 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2006 | -2.28x | $-4.11 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2005 | -3.80x | $-5.32 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2004 | -2.12x | $-4.87 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -199.8% |
| 2003 | -0.71x | $-3.32 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2002 | -7.54x | $-3.77 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -207.8% |
| 2001 | -2.45x | $-2.45 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2000 | -3.24x | $-2.59 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 1998 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -88.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57x | $-1.67 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1996 | -2.89x | $-2.02 Million | $700.00K | — |