Imax Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imax Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Imax Corp (IMAX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($464.81 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Imax Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Imax Corp (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Imax Corp from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Imax Corp across 32 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Imax Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Imax Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Imax Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imax Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Imax Corp (IMAX) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $127.07 Million | $466.30 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $70.84 Million | $452.18 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $58.62 Million | $469.08 Million | ▲ +254.5% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $17.32 Million | $491.39 Million | ▲ +163.2% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $6.07 Million | $452.88 Million | ▲ +131.0% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-23.01 Million | $532.98 Million | ▼ -111.8% |
| 2019 | 0.37x | $90.38 Million | $245.97 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $109.97 Million | $274.24 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $85.37 Million | $263.00 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $77.87 Million | $230.78 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $84.20 Million | $253.86 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2014 | 0.45x | $86.91 Million | $194.85 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | $55.03 Million | $161.56 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $73.63 Million | $168.79 Million | ▲ +1417.9% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $6.25 Million | $217.38 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $58.49 Million | $190.63 Million | ▲ +350.9% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $13.78 Million | $202.53 Million | ▲ +438.2% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-6.55 Million | $325.44 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-6.22 Million | $293.35 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-5.84 Million | $279.17 Million | ▼ -378.9% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $2.09 Million | $279.07 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $11.41 Million | $273.23 Million | ▲ +237.4% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-9.18 Million | $302.15 Million | ▼ -151.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $20.36 Million | $346.65 Million | ▲ +732.6% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $2.68 Million | $379.96 Million | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-54.09 Million | $469.84 Million | ▼ -1799.1% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-2.59 Million | $427.10 Million | ▼ -110.2% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $23.90 Million | $400.90 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $11.60 Million | $259.00 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $26.78 Million | $251.09 Million | ▲ +266.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $3.96 Million | $136.08 Million | ▼ -70.9% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $13.10 Million | $130.80 Million | — |