KB Home (KBH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
KB Home (KBH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $306.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.82 Billion) in one year. See KB Home (KBH) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
KB Home Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for KB Home across 37 annual periods. Also explore KB Home net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for KB Home (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for KB Home. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KB Home market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $338.65 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $362.72 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $1.08 Billion | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +522.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $183.42 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▲ +563.1% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-37.30 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▼ -111.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $310.68 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +21.1% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $251.04 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $221.51 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $513.22 Million | $3.12 Billion | ▲ +197.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $188.66 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $181.19 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +127.3% |
| 2014 | -0.20x | $-630.69 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2013 | -0.17x | $-443.49 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -1153.3% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $34.62 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2011 | -0.17x | $-347.55 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -210.6% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-133.96 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -142.2% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $349.91 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $341.32 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $1.19 Billion | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +174.4% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $715.73 Million | $6.34 Billion | ▲ +1128.7% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-52.91 Million | $4.82 Billion | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-112.13 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -117.0% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $462.16 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $356.99 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▲ +636.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $45.92 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $64.54 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $106.80 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +653.9% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-12.80 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | $-29.00 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -107.6% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $330.80 Million | $902.20 Million | ▲ +901.1% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-52.90 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +56.8% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-111.10 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -263.8% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $56.90 Million | $878.60 Million | ▲ +392.0% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-24.30 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -113.0% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $180.60 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +596.1% |
| 1990 | -0.03x | $-43.30 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1989 | -0.04x | $-49.30 Million | $1.28 Billion | — |