Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.76 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.29 Billion) in one year. See Lennar Corporation free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lennar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lennar Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lennar Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lennar Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lennar Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $216.81 Million | $12.29 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $2.40 Billion | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $5.18 Billion | $12.53 Billion | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $3.27 Billion | $13.74 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $2.53 Billion | $12.21 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $4.19 Billion | $11.84 Billion | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $1.48 Billion | $13.33 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $1.71 Billion | $13.88 Billion | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $996.86 Million | $10.76 Billion | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $507.80 Million | $8.15 Billion | ▲ +225.7% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-419.65 Million | $8.47 Billion | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-788.49 Million | $7.67 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | $-807.71 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-424.65 Million | $6.36 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-259.13 Million | $5.85 Billion | ▼ -190.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $274.23 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $420.84 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $1.10 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +180.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $444.51 Million | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $554.65 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $580.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +185.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $204.57 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $59.20 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $479.40 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $121.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +96.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $63.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +152.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-91.10 Million | $904.30 Million | ▼ -984.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $12.20 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +172.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-13.10 Million | $834.60 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $101.80 Million | $759.10 Million | ▲ +242.5% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-68.50 Million | $728.10 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 1992 | -0.11x | $-72.30 Million | $661.00 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-26.70 Million | $571.10 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $38.00 Million | $565.50 Million | ▲ +1537.2% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $2.50 Million | $609.10 Million | — |