Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-284.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.94 Billion) in one year. See Lennar Corporation leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lennar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lennar Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Lennar Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lennar Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lennar Corporation. Check Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $216.81 Million | $12.29 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $2.40 Billion | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $5.18 Billion | $12.53 Billion | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $3.27 Billion | $13.74 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $2.53 Billion | $12.21 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $4.19 Billion | $11.84 Billion | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $1.48 Billion | $13.33 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $1.71 Billion | $13.88 Billion | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $996.86 Million | $10.76 Billion | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $507.80 Million | $8.15 Billion | ▲ +225.7% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-419.65 Million | $8.47 Billion | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-788.49 Million | $7.67 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | $-807.71 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-424.65 Million | $6.36 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-259.13 Million | $5.85 Billion | ▼ -190.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $274.23 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $420.84 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $1.10 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +180.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $444.51 Million | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $554.65 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $580.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +185.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $204.57 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $59.20 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $479.40 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $121.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +96.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $63.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +152.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-91.10 Million | $904.30 Million | ▼ -984.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $12.20 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +172.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-13.10 Million | $834.60 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $101.80 Million | $759.10 Million | ▲ +242.5% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-68.50 Million | $728.10 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 1992 | -0.11x | $-72.30 Million | $661.00 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-26.70 Million | $571.10 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $38.00 Million | $565.50 Million | ▲ +1537.2% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $2.50 Million | $609.10 Million | — |